| 1 |
On the completeness of scenario identification in process hazard analysis (PHA)
Baybutt P
Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries, 55, 492, 2018 |
| 2 |
Guidelines for designing risk matrices
Baybutt P
Process Safety Progress, 37(1), 49, 2018 |
| 3 |
The Validity of Engineering Judgment and Expert Opinion in Hazard and Risk Analysis: The Influence of Cognitive Biases
Baybutt P
Process Safety Progress, 37(2), 205, 2018 |
| 4 |
Get Creative with Process Safety Management
Baybutt P
Chemical Engineering Progress, 113(4), 58, 2017 |
| 5 |
Overcoming challenges in using layers of protection analysis (LOPA) to determine safety integrity levels (SILs)
Baybutt P
Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries, 48, 32, 2017 |
| 6 |
Issues for security risk assessment in the process industries
Baybutt P
Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries, 49, 509, 2017 |
| 7 |
Simultaneous Operation (SIMOP) Review: An Important Hazard Analysis Tool
Baybutt P
Process Safety Progress, 36(1), 62, 2017 |
| 8 |
Cognitive biases in process hazard analysis
Baybutt P
Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries, 43, 372, 2016 |
| 9 |
Insights into process safety incidents from an analysis of CSB investigations
Baybutt P
Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries, 43, 537, 2016 |
| 10 |
Design intent for hazard and operability studies
Baybutt P
Process Safety Progress, 35(1), 36, 2016 |
