| 1 |
A robust decision making approach for hydrogen power plant site selection utilizing (R, S)-Norm Pythagorean Fuzzy information measures based on VIKOR and TOPSIS method
Guleria A, Bajaj RK
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(38), 18802, 2020 |
| 2 |
Real-time risk analysis of road tanker containing flammable liquid based on fuzzy Bayesian network
Li YT, Xu DD, Shuai J
Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 134, 36, 2020 |
| 3 |
Supporting risk management decision making by converting linguistic graded qualitative risk matrices through interval type-2 fuzzy sets
Hong YZ, Pasman HJ, Quddus N, Mannan MS
Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 134, 308, 2020 |
| 4 |
Constructing energy poverty profiles for an effective energy policy
Primc K, Slabe-Erker R, Majcen B
Energy Policy, 128, 727, 2019 |
| 5 |
Application of normal wiggly dual hesitant fuzzy sets to site selection for hydrogen underground storage
Narayanamoorthy S, Ramya L, Baleanu D, Kureethara JV, Annapoorani V
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(54), 28874, 2019 |
| 6 |
Uncertainty handling in fault tree based risk assessment: State of the art and future perspectives
Yazdi M, Kabir S, Walker M
Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 131, 89, 2019 |
| 7 |
Operating reserve capacity evaluation of aggregated heterogeneous TCLs with price signals
Xie DJ, Hui HX, Ding Y, Lin ZZ
Applied Energy, 216, 338, 2018 |
| 8 |
Evaluation of renewable power sources using a fuzzy MCDM based on cumulative prospect theory: A case in China
Wu YN, Xu CB, Zhang T
Energy, 147, 1227, 2018 |
| 9 |
Multi-objective optimisation and fast decision-making method for working fluid selection in organic Rankine cycle with low-temperature waste heat source in industry
Zhang X, Bai H, Zhao XC, Diabat A, Zhang J, Yuan HM, Zhang ZF
Energy Conversion and Management, 172, 200, 2018 |
| 10 |
Two ways to success expansion of renewable energies in comparison between Germany's federal states
Wurster S, Hagemann C
Energy Policy, 119, 610, 2018 |
