| 1 |
Flow characterization of compressible biomass particles using multiscale experiments and a hypoplastic model
Lu YM, Jin WC, Klinger J, Westover TL, Dai S
Powder Technology, 383, 396, 2021 |
| 2 |
DEM calibration of cohesive material in the ring shear test by applying a genetic algorithm framework
Mohajeri MJ, Do HQ, Schott DL
Advanced Powder Technology, 31(5), 1838, 2020 |
| 3 |
Calibration of the discrete element method: Strategies for spherical and non-spherical particles
Coetzee C
Powder Technology, 364, 851, 2020 |
| 4 |
A hybrid particle-geometric scaling approach for elasto-plastic adhesive DEM contact models
Mohajeri MJ, Helmons RLJ, van Rhee C, Schott DL
Powder Technology, 369, 72, 2020 |
| 5 |
A density dependent Drucker-Prager/Capmodel for ring shear simulation of ground loblolly pine
Jin WC, Klinger JL, Westover TL, Huang H
Powder Technology, 368, 45, 2020 |
| 6 |
Stretching the limits of dynamic and quasi-static flow testing on cohesive limestone powders
Shi H, Lumay G, Luding S
Powder Technology, 367, 183, 2020 |
| 7 |
Bulk properties variability and interdependency determination for cohesive iron ore
Mohajeri MJ, van den Bos MJ, van Rhee C, Schott DL
Powder Technology, 367, 539, 2020 |
| 8 |
Tensile strength of cohesive powders
Garcia-Trinanes P, Luding S, Shi H
Advanced Powder Technology, 30(12), 2868, 2019 |
| 9 |
Computational and Experimental Studies of Flexible Fiber Flows in a Normal-Stress-Fixed Shear Cell
Guo Y, Buettner K, Lane V, Wassgren C, Ketterhagen W, Hancock B, Curtis J
AIChE Journal, 65(1), 64, 2019 |
| 10 |
An alternative DEM parameter identification procedure based on experimental investigation: A case study of a ring shear cell
Falke T, de Payrebrune KM, Kirchhof S, Kuhnel L, Kuhnel R, Mutze T, Kroger M
Powder Technology, 328, 227, 2018 |
