| 1 - 1 |
Special Issue: Membranes and CO2 Separation Preface
Nunes SP, Aimar P |
| 2 - 10 |
Effect of pyrolysis atmosphere on separation performance of carbon molecular sieve membranes
Kiyono M, Williams PJ, Koros WJ |
| 11 - 24 |
Thermally rearranged (TR) polymer membranes for CO2 separation
Park HB, Han SH, Jung CH, Lee YM, Hill AJ |
| 25 - 36 |
Influence of TRIS-based co-monomer on structure and gas transport properties of cross-linked poly(ethylene oxide)
Kusuma VA, Freeman BD, Smith SL, Heilman AL, Kalika DS |
| 37 - 43 |
Main-chain imidazolium polymer membranes for CO2 separations: An initial study of a new ionic liquid-inspired platform
Carlisle TK, Bara JE, Lafrate AL, Gin DL, Noble RD |
| 44 - 53 |
Quaternary ammonium membrane materials for CO2 separation
Shishatskiy S, Pauls JR, Nunes SP, Peinemann KV |
| 54 - 63 |
Tuning of mass transport properties of multi-block copolymers for CO2 capture applications
Reijerkerk SR, Arun A, Gaymans RJ, Nijmeijer K, Wessling M |
| 64 - 79 |
Potentialities of microporous membranes for H-2/CO2 separation in future fossil fuel power plants: Evaluation of SiO2, ZrO2, Y2O3-ZrO2 and TiO2-ZrO2 sol-gel membranes
Van Gestel T, Sebold D, Hauler F, Meulenberg WA, Buchkremer HP |
| 80 - 85 |
Discussion of the complex thermo-mechanical behavior of Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3-delta
Huang BX, Malzbender J, Steinbrech RW, Singheiser L |
| 86 - 92 |
Fabrication and oxygen permeability of gastight, macrovoid-free Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3-delta capillaries for high temperature gas separation
Buysse C, Kovalevsky A, Snijkers F, Buekenhoudt A, Mullens S, Luyten J, Kretzschmar J, Lenaerts S |
| 93 - 101 |
Simulation of a membrane unit for oxyfuel power plants under consideration of realistic BSCF membrane properties
Engels S, Beggel F, Modigell M, Stadler H |
| 102 - 109 |
Influence of sintering conditions on microstructure and oxygen permeation of Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3-delta (BSCF) oxygen transport membranes
Baumann S, Schulze-Kuppers F, Roitsch S, Betz M, Zwick M, Pfaff EM, Meulenberg WA, Mayer J, Stover D |
| 110 - 114 |
Long-term flue gas exposure effects of silica membranes on porous steel substrate
Brands K, Uhlmann D, Smart S, Bram M, da Costa JCD |
| 115 - 125 |
Membrane technologies for CO2 separation
Brunetti A, Scura F, Barbieri G, Drioli E |
| 126 - 139 |
Power plant post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: An opportunity for membranes
Merkel TC, Lin HQ, Wei XT, Baker R |
| 140 - 148 |
A feasibility study of CO2 capture from flue gas by a facilitated transport membrane
Hussain A, Hagg MB |
| 149 - 159 |
Gas separation membranes for zero-emission fossil power plants: MEM-BRAIN
Czyperek M, Zapp P, Bouwmeester HJM, Modigell M, Ebert K, Voigt I, Meulenberg WA, Singheiser L, Stover D |
| 160 - 172 |
Multi-stage gas separation membrane processes used in post-combustion capture: Energetic and economic analyses
Zhao L, Riensche E, Blum L, Stolten D |
| 173 - 183 |
An evaluation of CO2 and H-2 selective polymeric membranes for CO2 separation in IGCC processes
Franz J, Scherer V |
