| 135 - 135 |
Designing protein function - Macromolecular design
Hocker B, Midelfort K |
| 136 - 146 |
An accurate binding interaction model in de novo computational protein design of interactions: If you build it, they will bind
London N, Ambroggio X |
| 147 - 162 |
Modular peptide binding: From a comparison of natural binders to designed armadillo repeat proteins
Reichen C, Hansen S, Pluckthun A |
| 163 - 167 |
Design of net-charged abc-type collagen heterotrimers
Parmar AS, Zahid S, Belure SV, Young R, Hasan N, Nanda V |
| 168 - 177 |
Affinity maturation of a computationally designed binding protein affords a functional but disordered polypeptide
Butz M, Kast P, Hilvert D |
| 178 - 185 |
Rational design of a zinc phthalocyanine binding protein
Mutter AC, Norman JA, Tiedemann MT, Singh S, Sha S, Morsi S, Ahmed I, Stillman MJ, Koder RL |
| 186 - 192 |
Change in protein-ligand specificity through binding pocket grafting
Scheib U, Shanmugaratnam S, Farias-Rico JA, Hocker B |
| 193 - 202 |
Computational design of protein-small molecule interfaces
Allison B, Combs S, DeLuca S, Lemmon G, Mizoue L, Meiler J |
| 203 - 214 |
Structure-guided engineering of Anticalins with improved binding behavior and biochemical characteristics for application in radio-immuno imaging and/or therapy
Eggenstein E, Eichinger A, Kim HJ, Skerra A |
| 215 - 222 |
Structure-based non-canonical amino acid design to covalently crosslink an antibody-antigen complex
Xu JQ, Tack D, Hughes RA, Ellington AD, Gray JJ |
| 223 - 227 |
Influence of canonical structure determining residues on antibody affinity and stability
Clark LA, Demarest SJ, Eldredge J, Jarpe MB, Li Y, Simon K, van Vlijmen HWT |
| 228 - 233 |
Variations in the stability of NCR ene reductase by rational enzyme loop modulation
Reich S, Kress N, Nest BM, Hauer B |
| 234 - 242 |
Protein design for pathway engineering
Eriksen DT, Lian JZ, Zhao HM |
