670 - 670 |
Monitoring and Process Control of Anaerobic Digestion Plants Liebetrau J, Kleinsteuber S, Jacobi F, Pfeiffer D |
671 - 679 |
Ammonium Chloride vs Urea-Induced Ammonia Inhibition of the Biogas Process Assessed by Stable Isotope Analysis Lv ZP, Jiang JH, Liebetrau J, Richnow HH, Fischer A, Acs N, Nikolausz M |
680 - 686 |
Measuring Biogas Composition with a Compact Microelectromechanical System-Based Spectrometer Eccleston R, Bongards M |
687 - 695 |
Microbial Electrochemical Sensors for Anaerobic Digestion Process Control - Performance of Electroactive Biofilms underReal Conditions Kretzschmar J, Bohme P, Liebetrau J, Mertig M, Harnisch F |
696 - 701 |
Real-Time Gas Quality Data for On-Demand Production of Biogas Bierer B, Nagele HJ, Perez AO, Wollenstein J, Kress P, Lemmer A, Palzer S |
702 - 710 |
Management of Gas Storages in Biogas Plants Kube J |
711 - 716 |
Laboratory Simulation of an Agricultural Biogas Plant Start-up Kozlowski K, Dach J, Lewicki A, Cieslik M, Czekala W, Janczak D, Brzoski M |
717 - 726 |
Two-Stage Dry Anaerobic Digestion Process Control of Biowaste for Hydrolysis and Biogas Optimization Micolucci F, Uellendhal H |
727 - 738 |
Near-Infrared Spectrum Analysis to Determine Relationships between Biochemical Composition and Anaerobic Digestion Performances Charnier C, Latrille E, Roger JM, Miroux J, Steyer JP |
739 - 746 |
A Scale-up Strategy for the Fluid Flow inBiogas Plants Annas S, Jantzen HA, Scholz J, Janoske U |
747 - 754 |
Using Digestate Compost as a Substrate forAnaerobic Digestion Wagner AO, Janetschek J, Illmer P |
755 - 760 |
Process Monitoring and Control for an Anaerobic Covered Lagoon Treating Abattoir Wastewater Schmidt T, McCabe B, Harris P |
761 - 767 |
Estimation of Methane Yields in Continuous Biogas Reactors Using Kinetic and Mass Flow Models Ward AJ, Feng L, Moset V, Moller HB |
768 - 775 |
Influence of External Forces during Supercooling on Dispersion Stability during Melt Emulsification Abramov S, Ahammou A, Karbstein HP |
776 - 787 |
Energy and Exergy Analysis of Power Generation Systems with Chemical Looping Combustion of Coal Luo M, Yi Y, Wang C, Liu K, Pan JF, Wang Q |
788 - 797 |
Effects of Solute Permeability on Permeation and Solute Rejection in Membrane Filtration Lopes GH, Ibaseta N, Guichardon P, Haldenwang P |
798 - 805 |
3D Printing for Chemical Process Laboratories II: Measuring Liquid-Solid Mass Transfer Coefficients Gelhausen MG, Lenz D, Krull F, Korkmaz V, Agar DW |
806 - 818 |
System Behavior and Predictive Controller Performance Near the Azeotropic Region Uddin F, Tufa LD, Maulud AS, Taqvi SA |
819 - 826 |
Rheological Behavior of Mixtures of Ionic Liquids with Water Kliemann C, Kleiber M, Muller K |
827 - 835 |
Experimental Studies of a Petlyuk Column and Validation of a Non-Equilibrium Stage Model Egger T, Hiller C, Fieg G |
836 - 844 |
Ethyl Lactate Synthesis by Catalytic Membranes in a Pervaporation-Assisted Membrane Reactor Nigiz FU, Hilmioglu ND |
845 - 852 |
Esterification of Oleic Acid with Methanol Using Zr(SO4)(2) as a Heterogeneous Catalyst Tarakci MIS, Ilgen O |
853 - 859 |
Pressure Drop in Emergency Vent Lines with Two-Phase Flow of Gas and Viscous Liquid Schmidt J, Giesbrecht H |
860 - 866 |
Flue-Gas Desulfurization by Using a HiGee Electric-Field Device Zou HK, Arowo M, Zhang Q, Zhang LL, Sun BC, Chu GW, Shao L, Chen JF |
867 - 874 |
Correlation between Liquid Product Distribution and H-2 Selectivity in Lignin Depolymerization Yang J, Liu ST, Liu CZ, Wang YY, Dai LY |
875 - 882 |
Laplace Transform Treatment forChemicalEngineering Systems: Whetherto Use 0(-) or 0(+)? Ahuja S, Arya RK |