1 - 7 |
NORIT AirLift MBR: side-stream system for municipal waste water treatment Futselaar H, Schonewille H, de Vente D, Broens L |
8 - 16 |
Landfill leachate treatment using thermophilic membrane bioreactor Visvanathan C, Choudhary MK, Montalbo MT, Jegatheesan V |
17 - 23 |
Data envelopment analysis for assessing optimal operation of an immersed membrane bioreactor equipped with a draft tube for domestic wastewater reclamation Bick A, Yang F, Shandalov S, Oron G |
24 - 32 |
Hydrocarbon removal from industrial wastewater by hollow-fibre membrane bioreactors Alberti F, Bienati B, Bottino A, Capannelli G, Comite A, Ferrari F, Firpo R |
33 - 38 |
Electroflocculation: the effect of zeta-potential on particle size Ofir E, Oren Y, Adin A |
39 - 45 |
Membrane bioreactor performances: effluent quality of continuous and sequencing systems for water reuse Lobos J, Wisniewski C, Heran M, Grasmick A |
46 - 62 |
Overview of in-situ applicable nitrate removal processes Della Rocca C, Belgiorno V, Meric S |
63 - 71 |
Nitrate removal from ternary ionic solutions by a tight nanofiltration membrane Santafe-Moros A, Gozalvez-Zafrilla JM, Lora-Garcia J |
72 - 78 |
Valorisation of olive pits using biological denitrification Salem Z, Lebik H, Cherafa WK, Allia K |
79 - 86 |
Modified equilibrium-solubility domains and a kinetic model of iron oxide and hydroxide colloids for electroflocculation Ofir E, Oren Y, Adin A |
87 - 93 |
Comparing pretreatment by iron of electro-flocculation and chemical flocculation Ofir E, Oren Y, Adin A |
94 - 101 |
Re-assessing the impact of desalination plants brine discharges on eroding beaches Al-Barwani HH, Purnama A |
102 - 112 |
Treatment of agricultural drainage water: technological schemes and financial indicators Talaat HA, Ahmed SR |
113 - 120 |
Minimize the negative impact of oil contamination on Abu Dhabi power and desalination plants Mohamed KA |
121 - 131 |
Life cycle assessment of water treatment technologies: wastewater and water-reuse in a small town Ortiz M, Raluy RG, Serra L, Uche J |
132 - 144 |
Detection of fouling on RO modules by residence time distribution analyses Hasson D, Drak A, Komlos C, Yang QF, Semiat R |
145 - 147 |
Air/water cleaning for biofouling control in spiral wound membrane elements Cornelissen ER, Vrouwenvelder JS, Heijman SGJ, Viallefont XD, van der Kooij D, Wessels LP |
148 - 154 |
Fouling in reverse osmosis: Detection by non-invasive techniques Chong TH, Wong FS, Fane AG |
155 - 169 |
Membrane autopsy as a sustainable management of fouling phenomena occurring in MF, UF and NF processes Pontie M, Thekkedath A, Kecili K, Habarou H, Suty H, Croue JP |
170 - 174 |
The Membrane Fouling Simulator as a new tool for biofouling control of spiral-wound membranes Vrouwenvelder JS, Bakker SM, Wessels LP, van Paassen JAM |
175 - 180 |
Relationship between biofouling and recovery ratio: the theoretical approach and one experimental case Sommariva C, Comite A, Capannelli G, Bottino A |
181 - 188 |
Effect of coagulation pretreatment on fouling of an ultrafiltration membrane Chen Y, Dong BZ, Gao NY, Fan JC |
189 - 197 |
Application of the new solution ACTIDisc (R) on secondary effluent reclamation in Castellon de la Plana Sanz J, Guerrero L, Ortega JM, Ferrer C, Miguel D, Martinez F |
198 - 203 |
A technique for purifying wastewater with polymeric flocculant produced from waste plastic Bekri-Abbes I, Bayoudh S, Baklouti M |
204 - 212 |
Effect of natural coagulant application on microfiltration performance in treatment of secondary oxidation pond effluent Katayon S, Noor MJMM, Tat WK, Halim GA, Thamer AM, Badronisa Y |
213 - 218 |
Chemical cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes in the milk industry Kazemimoghadam M, Mohammadi T |
219 - 226 |
Reuse of tannery wastewaters by combination of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis after a conventional physical-chemical treatment Fababuj-Roger M, Mendoza-Roca JA, Galiana-Aleixandre MV, Bes-Pia A, Cuartas-Uribe B, Iborra-Clar A |
227 - 233 |
Effect of sonication on combined treatment of landfill leachate and domestic sewage in SBR reactor Neczaj E, Kacprzak M, Lach J, Okoniewska E |
234 - 240 |
Carrier-mediated transport of Cr(III) across Lasalocid A-NPOE supported liquid membrane Tayeb R, Zaghbani A, Tingry S, Seta P, Dhahbi M |
241 - 254 |
Integrated membrane solutions for green textile industries ElDefrawy NMH, Shaalan HF |
255 - 264 |
Combining air sparging and the use of a static mixer in cross-flow ultrafiltratioin of oil/water emulsion Vatai GN, Krstic DM, Hoflinger W, Koris AK, Tekic MN |
265 - 276 |
Techno economic evaluation for the treatment of pesticide industry effluents using membrane schemes Shaalan HF, Ghaly MY, Farah JY |
277 - 295 |
A comparative study of the flocculation behaviour and final properties of synthetic and activated sludge in wastewater treatment Nguyen TP, Hankins NP, Hilal N |
296 - 306 |
Evidence of changes in membrane pore characteristics due to filtration of dye bath liquors Denyer P, Shu L, Jegatheesan V |
307 - 315 |
The effect of dispersed materials on baromembrane treatment of uranium-containing waters Kryvoruchko AP, Atamanenko ID |
316 - 321 |
Aquapot: UF real applications for water potabilization in developing countries. Problems, location and solutions adopted Arnal JM, Sancho M, Fayos BG, Lora J, Verdu G |
322 - 327 |
Research of a PVA composite ultrafiltration membrane used in oil-in-water Shang Y, Peng YL |
328 - 334 |
Modelling of flux decline in crossflow ultrafiltration of macromolecules: comparison between predicted and experimental results Vela MCV, Blanco SA, Garcia JL, Gozalvez-Zafrilla JM, Rodriguez EB |
335 - 343 |
Removal of perchlorate from groundwater by the polyelectolyte-enhanced ultrafiltration process Huq HP, Yang JS, Yang JW |
344 - 350 |
Validation of dynamic models to predict flux decline in the ultrafiltration of macromolecules Vela MCV, Rodriguez EB, Blanco SA, Garcia J |
351 - 358 |
Ultrafiltration of surface water with coagulation pretreatment by streaming current control Xia SJ, Li X, Zhang QL, Xu B, Li GB |
359 - 367 |
Retention modelling of the bivalent cations in crossflow nanofiltration investigation in the porous models Chaabane T, Taha S, Ahmed MT, Maachi R, Dorange G |
368 - 373 |
Potable water production from pesticide contaminated surface water - A membrane based approach Sarkar B, Venkateshwarlu N, Rao RN, Bhattacharjee C, Kale V |
374 - 379 |
Study of arsenic removal by nanofiltration and its application in China Xia SJ, Dong BZ, Zhang QL, Xu B, Gao NY, Causseranda C |
380 - 384 |
Feasibility study of selectivity forecast of nanofiltration membranes Kavitskaya A, Kononova A, Kucheruk D |
385 - 402 |
Scale formation in desalination plants: effect of carbon dioxide solubility Al-Anezi K, Hilal N |
403 - 415 |
Desalination experience in Kuwait Al-bahou M, Al-Rakaf Z, Zaki H, Ettouney H |
416 - 422 |
Simulation of heat and mass transfer in a multi-effect distillation plant for seawater desalination Raach H, Mitrovic J |
423 - 436 |
Heat transfer measurement as a criterion for performance evaluation of scale inhibition in MSF plants in Kuwait Al-Deffeeri NS |
437 - 447 |
Experimental investigations on a two-phase jet pump used in desalination systems Kumar RS, Kumaraswamy S, Mani A |
448 - 463 |
Effects of process parameters and anti-scalants on scale formation in horizontal tube falling film evaporators Wildebrand C, Glade H, Will S, Essig M, Rieger J, Buchner KH, Brodt G |
464 - 470 |
Utilization of waste heat in the desalination process Shih H, Shih T |
471 - 481 |
Condensation of water vapor in a vertical channel by mixed convection of humid air in the presence of a liquid film flowing down Mohamed AB, Orfi J, Debissi C, Ben Nasrallah S |
482 - 500 |
Analysis of a new design of a multi-stage flash-mechanical vapor compression desalination process Mabrouk AA, Nafey AS, Fath HES |
501 - 514 |
Simulation of large capacity MSF brine circulation plants Abdel-Jabbar NM, Qiblawey HM, Mjalli FS, Ettouney H |