| 1 - 3 |
Air quality: mercury, trace elements and particulate matter
Benson SA, Brown TD |
| 5 - 19 |
Status of research on air quality: mercury, trace elements, and particulate matter
Sondreal EA, Benson SA, Pavlish JH |
| 21 - 33 |
Why trace elements are important
Swaine DJ |
| 35 - 42 |
Mercury - are we studying the right endpoints and mechanisms
Silbergeld EK, Devine PJ |
| 43 - 54 |
Site-specific reference dose for methylmercury for fish-eating populations
Clewell HJ, Crump KS, Gentry PR, Shipp AM |
| 55 - 67 |
Fine particulate matter and cardiovascular disease
Neas LM |
| 69 - 77 |
Mercury reduction efforts in Michigan
Taylor JK |
| 79 - 99 |
Minnesota's mercury contamination reduction initiative
Jackson AM, Swain EB, Andrews CA, Rae D |
| 101 - 115 |
A North American inventory of anthropogenic mercury emissions
Pai P, Niemi D, Powers B |
| 117 - 125 |
A utility perspective on fine particulate regulation: how do we get it right?
McManus JM, Blake FE |
| 127 - 141 |
PM10 and PM2.5: an international perspective
Sloss LL, Smith IM |
| 143 - 156 |
Measurements and modeling of a water soluble gas-phase mercury species in ambient air
Lindberg SE, Stratton WJ, Pai P, Allan MA |
| 157 - 165 |
Effects of flue gas constituents on mercury speciation
Laudal DL, Brown TD, Nott BR |
| 167 - 175 |
Cryogenic trapping of oxidized mercury species from combustion flue gas
Thompson JS, Pavlish JH |
| 177 - 188 |
Characterizing PM2.5 emission profiles for stationary sources: comparison of traditional and dilution sampling techniques
England GC, Zielinska B, Loos K, Crane I, Ritter K |
| 189 - 202 |
A new methodology for source characterization of oil combustion particulate matter
Lee SW, Pomalis R, Kan B |
| 203 - 218 |
XAFS spectroscopic characterization of elements in combustion ash and fine particulate matter
Huggins FE, Shah N, Huffman GP, Robertson JD |
| 219 - 229 |
Real-time measurement of trace metals on fine particles by laser-induced plasma techniques
Cheng MD |
| 231 - 246 |
Ion-drift reactor (TM) concept
Babko-Malyi S |
| 247 - 261 |
Precision of manual measurement techniques for metal stack gas emissions
Rigo HG, Chandler AJ |
| 263 - 288 |
Emissions of mercury, trace elements, and fine particles from stationary combustion sources
Senior CL, Helble JJ, Sarofim AF |
| 289 - 310 |
Mercury transformations in coal combustion flue gas
Galbreath KC, Zygarlicke CJ |
| 311 - 341 |
Control of mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants: a preliminary cost assessment and the next steps for accurately assessing control costs
Brown TD, Smith DN, O'Dowd WJ, Hargis RA |
| 343 - 363 |
Flue gas effects on a carbon-based mercury sorbent
Miller SJ, Dunham GE, Olson ES, Brown TD |
| 365 - 377 |
The fate of coal mercury during combustion
Gibb WH, Clarke F, Mehta AK |
| 379 - 392 |
An overview of PM2.5 sources and control strategies
Tucker WG |
| 393 - 405 |
The reduction of gas phase air toxics from combustion and incineration sources using the MET-Mitsui-BF activated coke process
Olson DG, Tsuji K, Shiraishi I |
| 407 - 422 |
An evaluation of coal preparation technologies for controlling trace element emissions
Luttrell GH, Kohmuench JN, Yoon RH |
| 423 - 438 |
Towards the development of a chemical kinetic model for the homogeneous oxidation of mercury by chlorine species
Sliger RN, Kramlich JC, Marinov NM |
| 439 - 457 |
A model for the particulate matter enrichment with toxic metals in solid fuel flames
Lockwood FC, Yousif S |
| 459 - 471 |
Current methods and research strategies for modeling atmospheric mercury
Bullock OR |
| 473 - 501 |
Spatial patterns of major aerosol species and selected heavy metals in the United States
Malm WC, Sisler JF |
