화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.30, No.9, 1741-1746, September, 2013
Effects of surfactant contamination on oxygen mass transfer in fine bubble aeration process
E-mail:,
The effects of anionic, cationic, and non-ionic surfactants (SDS, SDBS, CTAB and Tween20) on oxygen mass transfer (OMT) in fine bubble aeration systems were investigated. The overall gas-liquid volumetric mass transfer coefficient (KLa), specific interfacial area (a), and liquid-side mass transfer coefficient (KL) parameters were used to assess the influence of the surfactants. At the same concentration, the different surfactants were observed to influence the KLa value as follows: KLa (SDBS)>KLa (SDS)>KLa (tween20)>KLa (CTAB). For all used surfactants, the overall trends showed a significant decrease in the KLa value at low concentrations (0-5mg/L), while the KLa value recovered somewhat at high concentrations (10-20mg/L). The decrease to the KL value was found to be much larger than increase in the a value in the presence of surfactants. Furthermore, a simple model was established that provides an OMT prediction for different surfactants.
  1. Rice RG, Howell SW, AIChE J., 32, 1377 (1986)
  2. Reardon DJ, Civ. Eng., 65, 54 (1995)
  3. Fayolle Y, Cockx A, Gillot S, Roustan M, Heduit A, Chem. Eng. Sci., 62(24), 7163 (2007)
  4. Painmanakul P, Hebrard G, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 86(11A), 1207 (2008)
  5. Burris VL, Little JC, Water Sci. Technol., 37, 293 (1988)
  6. McGinnis DF, Little JC, Water Res., 36, 4627 (2002)
  7. Rosso D, Ph.D thesis, University of California Los Angeles (2005)
  8. Rosso D, Huo DL Stenstrom MK, Chem. Eng. Sci., 66, 5500 (2006)
  9. Rosso D, Huo DL, MK, Water Res., 40, 1397 (2006)
  10. Chern JM, Chou SR, Shang CH, Water Res., 35, 3041 (2001)
  11. Tzounakos A, Karamanev DG, Margaritis A, Bergougnou MA, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43(18), 5790 (2004)
  12. Alves SS, Orvalho SP, Vasconcelos JMT, Chem. Eng. Sci., 60(1), 1 (2005)
  13. Painmanakul P, Loubiere K, Hebrard G, Mietton-Peuchot M, Roustan M, Chem. Eng. Sci., 60(22), 6480 (2005)
  14. Sardeing R, Painmanakul P, Hebrard G, Chem. Eng. Sci., 61(19), 6249 (2006)
  15. Chen XL, Wang HC, Qi L, Luo T, Fan HT, Li MD, Acta Sci. Circum., 33, 2 (2013)
  16. Jiang AX, Xia B, Li YX, Safety and Environ. J., 4, 2 (2004)
  17. Wang HC, Municipal Eng. Tech., 1, 30 (1997)
  18. Liu LP, Environ. Sci. Survey., 29, 1 (2010)
  19. Painmanakul P, Loubiere K, Hebrard G, Buffiere P, Chem. Eng. Process., 43(11), 1347 (2004)
  20. http://www.seas.ucla.edu/stenstro/Bubble.pdf.
  21. Zhang SJ, Research on the three-dimensional numerical simulation of bubble dynamics, Hohai University (2006)
  22. ASCE, American Society of Civil Engineers-ASCE/EWRI 2-06, New York (2007)
  23. Loubiere K, Hebrard G, Chem. Eng. Process., 43(11), 1361 (2004)
  24. Eckenfelder WW, Barnhart EL, AIChE J., 17, 631 (1961)
  25. Liu C, Zhang L, Yang JL, Guo JB, Li ZX, Energy Environ.Tech., 2, 531 (2009)
  26. Rosso D, Stenstrom KM, Water Environ. Res. Foundation., 6, 4853 (2006)
  27. Stenstrom MK, Gilbert RG, Water Res., 15, 643 (1981)
  28. Wagner M, Popel RJ, Water Sci. Technol., 34, 249 (1996)
  29. Huo TL, Ph.D thesis, University of California (1998)
  30. Garcia-Abuin A, Gomez-Diaz D, Navaza JM, Sanjurjo B, Chem. Eng. Sci., 65(15), 4484 (2010)
  31. Higbie R, Trans. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng., 31, 365 (1935)
  32. Frossling N, Gerlands Beitr. Geophys., 52, 170 (1938)