화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.19, No.5, 1560-1565, September, 2013
Design and production of Hg0 calibrator, Hg2+ calibrator, and Hg2+ to Hg0 converter for a continuous Hg emission monitor
E-mail:
Hg calibration and conversion systems, which are integral parts of a continuous emission monitor for were designed, produced, and tested. First, both Hg0 and Hg2+ calibrators showed less than 10% difference between measured and theoretical values. Next, a Hg2+ to Hg0 thermal converter with a scrubber and heated gas lines showed a conversion efficiency higher than 95%. Finally, the laboratory-prepared Hg converter was tested at a full-scale medical waste incinerator. The Ontario Hydro Method was used for measurement and speciation of Hg. The results showed that the laboratory-prepared Hg converter was highly effective with highest conversion efficiency close to 94%.
  1. Laudal DL, Thompson JS, Pavlish JH, Brickett LA, Chu P, Fuel Process. Technol., 85(6-7), 501 (2004)
  2. Won JH, Park JY, Lee TG, Atmospheric Environment., 41, 7547 (2007)
  3. Won JH, Lee TG, Atmospheric Environment., 62, 265 (2012)
  4. Eom Y, Jeon SH, Ngo TA, Kim J, Lee TG, Catal. Lett., 121(3-4), 219 (2008)
  5. Jeon SH, Eom Y, Lee TG, Chemosphere., 71, 969 (2008)
  6. Worathanakul P, Kongkachuichay P, Noel JD, Suriyawong A, Giammar DE, Biswas P, Environmental Engineering Science., 25, 1061 (2008)
  7. Liu SY, Nengzi LC, Qu B, Liu P, Ye ZX, Environmental Engineering Science., 27, 323 (2010)
  8. Asasian N, Kaghazchi T, Soleimani M, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 18(1), 283 (2012)
  9. Cho JH, Lee TG, Eom Y, Journal of the Air & Waste Management., 62, 1208 (2012)
  10. Cho JH, Eom Y, Jeon SH, Lee TG, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 19(1), 144 (2013)
  11. U.S. EPA, Task Force on Ritualistic Uses of Hg.Report, EPA 540-R-01-005, Washington, DC (2002)
  12. Park JY, Won JH, Lee TG, Energy Fuels, 20(6), 2413 (2006)
  13. Sangtumrong S, Ramakul P, Satayaprasert C, Pancharoen U, Lothongkum AW, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 13(5), 751 (2007)
  14. Eom Y, Won JH, Ryu JY, Lee TG, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28(6), 1439 (2011)
  15. Lee TG, Eom Y, Lee CH, Song KS, Journal of the Air & Waste Management., 61, 1057 (2011)
  16. Song BY, Eom Y, Lee TG, Appl. Surf. Sci., 257(10), 4754 (2011)
  17. Lee KJ, Lee TG, Journal of Hazardous Materials., 241-242, 1 (2012)
  18. ASTM International, Standard Test Method for Elemental, Oxidized, Particle-Bound, and Total Hg in Flue Gas Generated from Coal-Fired Stationary Sources (Ontario Hydro Method), ASTM D6784, West Conoshockton, PA (2002)
  19. U.S. EPA, Method 30A.Determination of Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emissions from Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure), Washington, DC (2007)
  20. U.S. EPA, Method 30B.Determination of Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Combustion Sources using Carbon Sorbent Traps, Washington, DC (2008)
  21. Federal Register, Standards of Performance for New and Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Steam Generating Units; Final Rule, EPA 40 CFR Parts 60, 72, 75 (2005)
  22. U.S. EPA, Traceability Protocol for Qualification and Certification of Elemental Mercury Gas Calibrators, Washington, DC (2007)
  23. Western Research Institute, Mercury Calibration System Topical Report, WRI-09-R023, Laramie, WY (2009)
  24. National Institute of Environmental Research, Report on Mercury Emissions from Combustion Sources, Republic of Korea (2008)
  25. Senior CL, Sarofim AF, Zeng T, Helble JJ, Mamani-Paco R, Fuel Processing Technology., 63, 197 (2000)