화학공학소재연구정보센터
Polymer(Korea), Vol.37, No.5, 613-617, September, 2013
나노 케냐프 셀룰로오스가 폴리프로필렌 복합소재의 물성 증가에 미치는 영향
Nano-Kenaf Cellulose Effects on Improved Mechanical Properties of Polypropylene Composite
E-mail:
초록
나노입자크기의 케냐프섬유를 폴리프로필렌에 첨가하였을 시, 복합소재의 물성변화를 관찰하였다. 천연크기의 케냐프섬유를 나노입자크기의 케냐프섬유로 대체하였을 시, 그 복합소재의 인장강도, 휨강도, 충격강도, 열변형온도가 증가한 반면에, 용융지수, 연신율(%), 충격강도 등이 감소하였다. 이는 나노입자크기의 케냐프섬유가 폴리프로필렌과 접촉하는 표면적의 증가와 섬유표면에 존재하는 휘발성 추출물질 등의 불순물의 감소에 따른 것으로 판단된다.
The effects of nano size kenaf cellulose fiber on mechanical property of polypropylene (PP) composite were investigated. The addition of nano-kenaf in place of natural kenaf showed higher tensile strength, flexural strength, impact strength, and heat deflection temperature compared to the natural kenaf filled PP composite, while it shows lower melt flow index, elongation%, and flexural modulus. These seemed to be due to the increased surface area of nano-kenaf fiber contacting PP matrix and reduced impurities such as volatile extractives on the fiber surface.
  1. Czarnecki L, White JL, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 25, 1217 (1980)
  2. Dalvag H, Klason C, Stromvall HE, Int. J. Polym. Mater., 11, 9 (1985)
  3. Michell AJ, Appita., 39, 223 (1986)
  4. Sanschagrin BS, Sean T, Kokta BV, J. Thermoplast.Compos., 1, 184 (1988)
  5. Sakurada I, Nukushina Y, Ito T, J. Polym. Sci., 57, 651 (1962)
  6. Yano H, “Research and application of cellulose nanofibre reinforced composites”, Paper presented at 10th International Conference on Progress in Biofibre Plastic Composites, Totonto Canada, Opening Plenary Session, May 12-13 (2008)
  7. Bledzki AK, Faruk O, Sperber VE, Macromol. Mater.Eng., 291, 449 (2006)
  8. OH JS, Lee S, Kim KJ, Elastom. Compos., 46, 125 (2011)
  9. Shon KS, Korea Patent 10-1196641 (2012)
  10. White JL, Kim KJ, Thermoplastic and Rubber Compounds: Technology and Physical Chemistry, Hanser Publisher, Munich, Cincinnati (2008)
  11. Suetsugu Y, White JL, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 28, 1481 (1983)
  12. Gupta RK, Kennel E, Kim KJ, Polymer Nanocomposites Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)
  13. Yosomiya R, Morimoto K, Nakajima A, Ikada Y, Toshio S, Adhesion and Bonding in Composites, Dekker, New York (1989)
  14. Woodward AE, Atlas of Polymer Morphology, Munich, Hanser (1988)
  15. Woodward AE, Morrow DR, J. Polym. Sci. A2., 7, 1651 (1969)
  16. Kim KJ, Bumm S, Gupta RK, White JL, Compos. Interfaces, 15(2-3), 301 (2008)
  17. Stanly RG, Forest Prod. J., 16, 62 (1966)
  18. Rowe JW, Conner AH, “Extractives in eastern hardwoodsa review”, General Technical report FPL18, Forest products laboratory, Forest service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Madison, WI (1979)
  19. Kim KJ, Bumm S, White JL, J. Biobased Mater. Bio., 1, 388 (2007)
  20. Kim KJ, Bumm S, White JL, Compos. Interfaces, 15(2-3), 231 (2008)
  21. Kim KJ, White JL, Compos. Interface., 16, 539 (2009)
  22. Kim KJ, White JL, Compos. Interfaces, 16(7-9), 619 (2009)
  23. Rizvi G, Matuana LM, Park CB, Polym. Eng. Sci., 40(10), 2124 (2000)
  24. Guo G, Rizvi GM, Park CB, Lin WS, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 91(1), 621 (2004)
  25. Chang WP, Kim KJ, Gupta RK, Compos. Interfaces, 16(7-9), 687 (2009)
  26. Chang WP, Kim KJ, Gupta RK, Compos. Interfaces, 16(7-9), 937 (2009)