화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Korean Chemical Engineering Research, Vol.51, No.6, 645-654, December, 2013
Export Citation
기후변화 등 잠재적 영향을 고려한 수중 미량오염물질의 관리방향 연구
A Study on the Management of Micropollutants in Water System Considering Climate Change and other Potential Effects
김호정†, 홍용석1, 안종호
  • 한국환경정책·평가연구원 물환경연구실, 122-706 서울시 은평구 진흥로 215
  • 1고려대학교 환경기술정책협동과정, 환경시스템공학과, 339-700 세종특별자치시 세종로 2511
Hojeong Kim†, Yongsuk Hong1, and Jong Ho Ahn
  • Division of Water Environment, Korea Environment Institute (KEI), 215 Jinheungno, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul 122-706, Korea
  • 1Program in Environmental Technology and Policy, Department of Environmental Engineering, Korea University, 2511 Sejong-ro, Sejong City 339-700, Korea
E-mail:
초록
본 논문에서는 국내·외 미량오염물질의 관리현황을 분석하고, 기후변화 등 수질관리에 영향을 주는 잠재적인 요소를 고려한 미량오염물질의 관리방향을 제시하고자 하였다. 국내에서는 먹는 물 안전성 확보를 위해 수돗물 정수 및 원수를 대상으로 미량오염물질에 대한 실태조사가 꾸준히 진행되었다. 근래에 들어 하천·호소수 중의 미량오염물질에 대해서도 조사가 진행되고 있으나 조사 항목과 횟수가 많지 않아 전체적인 미량오염물질 발생 및 검출 현황을 파악하기에는 어려움이 있었다. 선진국에서는 미량오염물질의 실태조사 외에도 환경 매체에서의 거동, 인체 및 생태위해성, 처리공정 등에 미량오염물질 관리 전반에 대한 연구가 수행되고 있음을 확인할 수 있었다. 향후 기후변화에 따른 기온과 수온의 상승, 수문학적인 순환의 변화 등으로 미량오염물질의 잔류 농도가 증가할 우려가 있다. 또한 물 재이용이 확대되는 과정에서 미량오염물질에 대한 우려가 커질 수 있다. 그러므로 먹는 물 또는 신체와 접촉하는 용도의 용수에 대해서는 사전예방의 관점에서 미량오염물질의 관리를 강화하는 것이 필요하다. 지표수 중의 미량오염물질에 대해서는, 물환경 정책목표 중의 하나인 생태 위해성 관리의 관점에서, 물질의 거동, 생태 위해성 평가, 하·폐수처리공정에서의 제어방안 등에 대한 연구가 확대되어야 할 것이다.
In this study, the management polices of micropollutants (MPs) were reviewed and the future management strategy was discussed considering climate change and etc. In Korea, the investigation of drinking water has been actively carried out for the priority contaminants as well as MPs. Recently river and lake waters have been also examined for MPs. However, the coverage and depth of the investigation is limited. Moreover, climate change is likely to increase air & water temperature and it will affect the hydrological cycle. Such changes may increase the residual concentrations of MPs in water system. As water reuse increases, the residual MPs of the recycled water may create public concerns. Thus, in a viewpoint of the precautionary principle, more stringent management of MPs is recommended for the drinking water and the body-contact water use. For the surface water, more studies are necessary to understand the ecological risk by MPs.
Keywords:Drinking Water;Disinfection by-products;Micropollutants;Pharmaceuticals;Environmental Policy;Water Reuse
  1. Daughton CG, Environmental Impact Assessment Review., 24, 711 (2004)
  2. Palaniappan M, Clearing the Waters: A Focus on Water Quality Solutions, United Nations Environment Programme, Division of Environmental Policy Implementation (2010)
  3. Snyder SA, Vanderford BJ, Drewes J, Dickenson E, Snyder E, Bruce GM, Pleus R, State of Knowledge of Endocrine Disruptors and Pharmaceuticals in Drinking Water, Awwa Research Foundation (2008)
  4. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/toxics/sources/emergingemergingcontaminants-fact-sheet-and-overview.html (accessed 31 July 2013).
  5. Ministry of Environment, “National Water Environment Management Plan : A Masterplan of Water Quality Conservation at 4 Major River Basins (2006-2015),” (2006)
  6. Nakdong River Watershed Management Comimttee, “Study on the Optimum Management of Micor-pollutants in Industrial Wastewater," (2005)
  7. Nakdong River Watershed Management Comimttee, “Risk assessment of the raw water,” (2006)
  8. Nakdong River Watershed Management Comimttee, “Nakdong Basin-wide Monitoring of Potentially Hazardous Organics and Development of Prediction System,” (2008)
  9. Nakdong River Watershed Management Comimttee, “Third Phase of Environmental Survey Project Master Plan at Nakdong River System," (2012)
  10. Ministry of Environment, “Guideline for the Operation of Drinking Water Quality Surveillance Substances,” (2012)
  11. National Institute of Environmental Research, “A Study on Management of Unregulated Trace Hazardous Compounds in Drinking Water (II),” (2008)
  12. Ministry of Environment, “Rules on the Management of Newly Detected Micro-hazardous Materials”.
  13. Office for Government Policy Coordination, The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, Food & Drug Administration. “A comprehensive plan for the management of antibiotic resistance (2008-2012),” (2007)
  14. USGS, Toxic substances hydrology program, http://toxics.usgs.gov/index.html (accessed 31 July 2013).
  15. USGS, Emerging contaminants in the environment, http://toxics.usgs.gov/regional/emc/index.html (accessed 31 July 2013).
  16. Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN), Micropollutants - measures at wastewater treatment, http://www.bafu.admin.ch/gewaesserschutz/03716/11218/11223/index.html?lang=en (accessed 31 July 2013).
  17. Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN), “Faktenblatt: Projekt Strategie Micropoll - Modellstudie Ch.,” (2007)
  18. Abegglen C., “Eliminating Micropollutants: Wastewater Treatment Methods,” Eawag News 67e/October (2009)
  19. Ministry of Environment, “Development of the Investigatoin and Management Measures of Hazaroud Substances for Increaseing the Number of Items Related to Protection of Human Health,” (2008)
  20. Ministry of Agriculture & Forestry, “Risk Information Manual on Agriculture and Food,” (2005)
  21. National Institute of Environmental Research, “Study on Extended Authorization of Specific Toxic Substance and Establishment of the Effluent Standard (III),” (2004)
  22. Ministry of Environment, “Detection of Some Pharmaceuticals Such as Antibiotics at Major River Water,” Press Release (21 March 2008).
  23. National Institute of Environmental Research, “A Study on Management of Unregulated Trace Hazardous Compounds in Drinking Water (I),” (2012)
  24. National Institute of Environmental Research, “A Study on the Estimation of the Discharge Loads of Perfluorinated Compounds (I),” (2010)
  25. Kim SK, Im JK, Kang YM, Jung SY, Kho YL, Zoh KD, J. Hazard. Mater., 201-202, 82 (2012)
  26. Carr GM, Neary JP, Water quality for ecosystem and human health, UNEP/Earthprint (2008)
  27. Phillips PJ, Chalmers AT, Gray JL, Kolpin DW, Foreman WT, Wall GR, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 5336 (2012)
  28. Kumar A, Williams M, Woods M, Kookana R, Barber L, Vajda A, Doan H, Gregg A, Gonzago D, Bain P, “Treated Effluent in the Aquatic Environment: Impact Assessment of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals,” Water for a Healthy Country Flagship Report series (2012)
  29. EAWAG, “Micropollutants in Water Resources: Prevention - Assessment - Removal,” Media release on Eawag Info Day (23 June 2009).
  30. Jenssen BM, Environ. Health Perspect., 114, 76 (2006)
  31. Cho YM, Yoon HH, “The Vitalization Strategy of Water Reuse and Reclamation Industry,” Seoul Development Institute (2009)
  32. Tripoli V, Williams CD, “Emerging Contaminants: A Review with Policy Recommendations,” National Center for Conservation Science & Policy (2008)
  33. Joss A, Siegrist H, Ternes T, Water Sci. Technol., 57, 251 (2008)
  34. Yu JJ, J. of KSEE., 31, 412 (2009)
  35. Yoo C, Lee TY, Kim J, Moon I, Jung JH, Han C, Oh JM, Lee IB, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(4), 567 (2007)
  36. Mohr TK, “Solvent Stabilizers,” Santa Clara Valley Water District, White Paper (2001)
  37. Snyder SA, Westerhoff P, Yoon Y, Sedlak DL, Environ. Eng. Sci., 20, 449 (2003)
  38. Yoo HI, Ryu SK, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 50(1), 83 (2012)
  39. Lee CH, Shun-hwa L, Jang IH, J. of KSEE., 31, 401 (2009)
  40. Ternes T, Janex-Habibi M, Knacker T, Kreuzinger N, Siegrist H, “Assessment of Technologies for the Removal of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in Sewage and Drinking Water Facilities to Improve the Indirect Potable Water Reuse,” Contract No. EVK1-CT-2000-00047 (2004)