Energy and Buildings, Vol.68, 351-363, 2014
Energy matching analysis of on-site micro-cogeneration for a single-family house with thermal and electrical tracking strategies
This paper conducts matching analysis for micro-cogeneration products with generated electrical power (G(elec)) range 0.5-2.0 kWe and electrical to thermal ratio (ETTR) range 0.05-0.80 for a Finnish single-family house. Using the recently defined matching indices and evolved criteria, the matching capabilities are comprehensively assessed from both electrical and thermal heat matching aspects. Furthermore, both of the thermal tracking (with electrical grid feed-in) and electrical tracking (with thermal heat grid feed-in) strategies are considered. The simulation tool is TRNSYS 17. In terms of the averaged matching index under the thermal tracking strategy without battery, the best matching happens with a fuel cell with G(elec) of 1.5 kWe and ETTR of 0.8, whereas under the condition with battery, the best matching happens with a Stirling engine or internal combustion engine with G(elec) of 1.0 kWe and ETTR of 0.3. Under the electrical tracking strategy, the best matching happens with a Stirling engine with G(elec) of 1.0-2.0 kWe and ETTR of 0.25. However, by putting certain preferences on the specific aspects of the matching capability, the best matching might be altered, which can be assessed using a weighted matching index. There is no linear relation between matching and primary energy consumption. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:Micro combined heat and power;Energy matching analysis;Mismatch;Electrical grid feed-in;Thermal heat grid feed-in;Building