Biomass gasification is a promising option for the sustainable production of hydrogen rich gas. Five different commercial or pilot scale gasification systems are considered for the design of a hydrogen production plant that generates almost pure hydrogen. For each of the gasification technique models of two different hydrogen production plants are developed in Cycle-Tempo: one plant with low temperature gas cleaning (LTGC) and the other with high temperature gas cleaning (HTGC). The thermal input of all plants is 10 MW of biomass with the same dry composition. An exergy analysis of all processes has been made. The processes are compared on their thermodynamic performance (hydrogen yield and exergy efficiency). Since the heat recovery is not incorporated in the models, two efficiencies are calculated. The first one is calculated for the case that all residual heat can be applied, the case with ideal heat recovery, and the other is calculated for the case without heat recovery. It is expected that in real systems only a part of the residual heat can be used. Therefore, the actual value will be in between these calculated values. it was found that three processes have almost the same performance: The Battelle gasification process with LTGC, the FICFB gasification process with LTGC, and the Blaue Turm gasification process with HTGC. All systems include further processing of the cleaned gas from biomass gasification into almost pure hydrogen. The calculated exergy efficiencies are, respectively, 50.69%, 45.95%, and 50.52% for the systems without heat recovery. The exergy efficiencies of the systems with heat recovery are, respectively, 62.79%, 64.41%, and 66.31%. The calculated hydrogen yields of the three processes do not differ very much. The hydrogen yield of the Battelle LTGC process appeared to be 0.097 kg (kg((dry biomass)))(-1), for the FICFB LTGC process a yield of 0.096 kg (kg((dry biomass)))(-1) was found, and for the Blaue Turm HTGC 0.106 kg (kg((dry biomass)))(-1). Since the Blaue Turm gasification process is far behind the technologies of the Battelle and FICFB processes it is concluded that further consideration of the Battelle and FICFB processes has to be preferred for the generation of highly pure hydrogen. (C) 2008 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.