International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol.36, No.3, 2057-2075, 2011
Hydrogen production by sorption enhanced steam reforming of oxygenated hydrocarbons (ethanol, glycerol, n-butanol and methanol): Thermodynamic modelling
Thermodynamic analysis of steam reforming of different oxygenated hydrocarbons (ethanol, glycerol, n-butanol and methanol) with and without CaO as CO(2) sorbent is carried out to determine favorable operating conditions to produce high-quality H(2) gas. The results indicate that the sorption enhanced steam reforming (SESR) is a fuel flexible and effective process to produce high-purity H(2) with low contents of CO, CO(2) and CH(4) in the temperature range of 723-873 K. In addition, the separation of CO(2) from the gas phase greatly inhibits carbon deposition at low and moderate temperatures. For all the oxygenated hydrocarbons investigated in this work, thermodynamic predictions indicate that high-purity hydrogen with CO content within 20 ppm required for proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) applications can be directly produced by a single-step SESR process in the temperature range of 723-773 K at pressures of 3-5 atm. Thus, further processes involving water-gas shift (WGS) and preferential CO oxidation (COPROX) reactors are not necessary. In the case of ethanol and methanol, the theoretical findings of the present analysis are corroborated by experimental results from literature. In the other cases, the results could provide an indication of the starting point for experimental research. At P = S atm and T = 773 K, it is possible to obtain H(2) at concentrations over 97 mol% along with CO content around 10 ppm and a thermal efficiency greater than 76%. In order to achieve such a reformate composition, the optimized steam-to-fuel molar ratios are 6:1, 9:1, 12:1 and 4:1 for ethanol, glycerol, n-butanol and methanol, respectively, with CaO in the stoichiometric ratio to carbon atom. (C) 2010 Professor T. Nejat Veziroglu. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:Biofuels;Steam reforming;Sorption enhanced;Hydrogen production;Gibbs energy minimization method;Fuel Cells