Exergy analysis is a more powerful tool than mere energy analysis for showing the improvement potential of energy systems. Direct use of solar radiation instead of degrading other high quality energy resources found in nature is advantageous. Yet, due to physical inconsistencies present in the exergy analysis framework for assessing direct-solar systems commonly found in literature, high exergy losses arise in the conversion process of solar radiation in direct-solar systems. However, these losses are disregarded in indirect-solar systems. In this paper, contradictions and physical inconsistencies which result from including the conversion of solar radiation only for direct-solar systems are shown. An evaluation framework physically coherent for systems making direct and indirect use of solar radiation is derived and its physical correctness is thoroughly discussed. Results from case studies using the proposed framework are presented and compared with the conventional approach, enabling their direct comparison and better understanding of the benefits and correctness of the proposed method. The new method allows recognizing clearly the suitability of direct-solar systems, being appropriate for highlighting more sustainable energy supply systems. Although this paper focuses on building systems, the framework might be used for exergy analysis of direct-solar systems in the context of other energy uses. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.