화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.31, No.11, 2008-2013, November, 2014
Pulse-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of fluorine-contaminated soil
E-mail:
The presence of abundant fluorides in soil can pose potential threats to environment and human health. We investigated the effects of pulsed electric field on electrokinetic remediation of fluorine-contaminated soil by varying the pulse interval. Although the remediation time was increased, experimental results indicated pulse-enhanced electrokinetic remediation could improve the removal efficiency of fluorine better than the conventional electrokinetic remediation in the same intensity of electric field. The fluorine removal efficiency of the former (30 min, pulse interval) was 80.93% and that of normal electrokinetic remediation was 72.40%, because pulsed electric field could reduce the concentration polarization and increase the electrical current, electroosmotic flow and the electrical voltage part in soil cell. Therefore, in the later phase of electrokinetic remediation, when electrical current and the fluorine removal efficiency decreased obviously, at this time the pulse-enhanced method would be a considerable choice to eliminate fluorine in contaminated soils.
  1. Camargo JA, Chemosphere, 50, 251 (2003)
  2. Domingos M, Klumpp A, Rinaldi MCS, Modesto IF, Klumpp G, Delitti WBC, Plant. Soil, 249, 297 (2003)
  3. Liteplo R, Gomes R, Howe P, Malcolm H, World Health Organization, Geneva, 100 (2002)
  4. Evdokimova GA, Chemosphere, 42, 35 (2001)
  5. Alshawabkeh AN, Yeung AT, Bricka RM, J. Environ. Eng., 125, 27 (1999)
  6. Lu P, Feng QY, Meng QJ, Yuan T, Sep. Purif. Technol., 98, 216 (2012)
  7. Jurate V, Mika S, Petri L, Sci. Total. Environ., 289, 97 (2002)
  8. Peng GQ, Tian GM, Liu JZ, Bao QB, Zang L, Desalination, 271(1-3), 100 (2011)
  9. Chen JL, Yang SF, Wu CC, Ton S, Sep. Purif. Technol., 79(2), 157 (2011)
  10. Cang L, Wang QY, Zhou DM, Xu H, Sep. Purif. Technol., 79(2), 246 (2011)
  11. Giannis A, Pentari D, Wang JY, Gidarakos E, J. Hazard. Mater., 184(1-3), 547 (2010)
  12. Zhang P, Jin CJ, Zhao ZH, Tian GB, J. Hazard. Mater., 177(1-3), 1126 (2010)
  13. Ouhadi VR, Yong RN, Shariatmadari N, Saeidijam S, Goodarzi AR, Safari-Zanjani M, J. Hazard. Mater., 173(1-3), 87 (2010)
  14. Jeon CS, Yang JS, Kim KJ, Baek K, Clean-Soil. Air. Water, 38, 189 (2010)
  15. Ma JW, Wang FY, Huang ZH, Wang H, J. Hazard. Mater., 176(1-3), 715 (2010)
  16. Kim GN, Shon DB, Park HM, Lee KW, Chung US, Sep. Purif. Technol., 80(1), 67 (2011)
  17. Zhu SF, Zhang JH, Dong TY, Environ. Earth Sci., 2, 379 (2009)
  18. Ottosen LM, Hansen HK, Laursen S, Villumsen A, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 1711 (1997)
  19. Hansen HK, Rojo A, Ottosen LM, J. Hazard. Mater., 117(2-3), 179 (2005)
  20. Hoek EMV, Guiver M, Nikonenko V, Tarabara VV, Zydney AL, Encyclopedia of Membrane Science and Technology, 3, 2219 (2013)
  21. Sun TR, Ottosen LM, Jensen PE, J. Hazard. Mater., 237, 299 (2012)
  22. Hansen HK, Rojo A, Electrochim. Acta, 52(10), 3399 (2007)
  23. Sun TR, Ottosen LM, Electrochim. Acta, 86, 28 (2012)
  24. Ryu BG, Park SW, Baek K, Yang JS, Sep. Purif. Technol., 44, 2421 (2009)
  25. Ryu BG, Yang JS, Kim DH, Baek K, J. Appl. Electrochem., 40(6), 1039 (2010)
  26. Lee Y, Oa SW, Environ. Eng. Res., 17, 145 (2012)
  27. Mcquaker NR, Gurney M, Anal. Chem., 49, 53 (1977)
  28. Chen W, Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (ICBBE 2010), 1 (2010)
  29. Kim DH, Jeon CS, Baek K, Ko SH, Yang JS, J. Hazard. Mater., 161(1), 565 (2009)
  30. Hamed J, Acar Y, Gale R, J. Geotech. Energy, 117, 241 (1991)