화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Korean Chemical Engineering Research, Vol.53, No.1, 71-77, February, 2015
Export Citation
실제 혼합염색폐수의 유동상 시스템을 활용한 미생물처리와 하이브리드 재순환시스템처리
Treatment of an Authentic Textile-dyeing Wastewater Utilizing a Fluidized Biofilter and Hybrid Recirculating System Composed of the Fluidized Biofilter and a UV/photocatalytic Reactor
이은주1, 2, 임광희1, 2, †
  • 1대구대학교 화학공학과, 712-714 경북 경산시 진량읍 내리리 15
  • 2산업 및 환경폐가스 연구소, 712-714 경북 경산시 진량읍 내리리 15
Eun Ju Lee1, 2, and Kwang-Hee Lim1, 2, †
  • 1Department of Chemical Engineering, Daegu University, 15 Naeri-ri, Jillyang-eup, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 712-714, Korea
  • 2Research Institute for Industrial and Environmental Waste Air Treatment, , 15 Naeri-ri, Jillyang-eup, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 712-714, Korea
E-mail:
초록
D염색공단의 폴리에스테르 알카리 감량폐수가 혼합된 실제 혼합염색폐수를 처리하기 위하여 Pseudomonas sp. 및 Bacillus cereus/thuringiensis를 고정한 폐타이어담체를 충전한 유동상 바이오필터를 운전하였다. 또한 유동상 바이오필터와 450 W의 UV/광촉매반응기를 결합한 하이브리드 재순환시스템을 구축하여 stage I에서는 UV/광촉매반응기를 바이패스하고 유동상 바이오필터만을, stage II-i, ii, iii에서는 하이브리드 재순환시스템을 각각 운전하였다. 유동상 바이오필터만을 사용하였을 경우에 CODCr 및 색도 제거효율은 각각 75~80% 및 67%를 나타내었다. 한편 하이브리드 재순환시스템 운전에서 stage I에서 stage II-i로 전환되었을 때에 UV/광촉매산화공정의 CODCr 제거율이 20~30%에 달하여 총 CODCr 제거율은 75%로부터 80~85%까지 제고되었다. 한편 stage I에서 stage II-i로 전환되었을 때에 UV/광촉매산화공정의 색도제거율은 0~5%에 불과하였으나 총 색도제거율은 45~65%로부터 65~70%까지 제고되었다. 색도제거에서는 CODCr 제거와 다르게 UV/광촉매산화공정에 의하여 유동상 바이오필터의 효율이 제고되어서 하이브리드 재순환시스템의 시너지효과가 나타났다. 또한 색도제거에서는 CODCr 제거와 다르게 반송비 증가에 따른 광촉매 비활성화가 관찰되지 않았고, CODCr 제거에서 반송비 증가에 따른 광촉매 비활성화는 비가역적으로 관찰되었다.
A fluidized biofilter was filled with Pseudomonas sp. and Bacillus cereus/thuringiensis-fixed waste-tire crumb media and was run to treat authentic textile-dyeing wastewater mixed with alkaline polyester-weight-reducing wastewater. As a result, its removal efficiency of CODCr and color were 75~80% and 67%, respectively. In addition, upon constructing hybrid-recirculating system composed of the fluidized biofilter and a 450 W-UV/photocatalytic reactor, only fluidized biofilter was run bypassing UV/photocatalytic reactor at stage I. Subsequently, the hybrid system was continuously run at stage IIi, ii and iii. At stage II-i, the total removal efficiency of CODCr was enhanced to be 80~85%, compared to 75% at stage I, owing to 20~30% removal efficiency of the UV/photocatalytic reactor. However, at stage II-i, the total removal efficiency of color was enhanced to be 65~70%, compared to 45~65% at stage I, even though the removal efficiency of the UV/photocatalytic reactor was tantamount to merely 0~5%. As far as the removal efficiency of fluidized biofilter of the hybrid-recirculating system is concerned, its removal efficiency of color was enhanced by the synergy effect of the hybrid-recirculating system unlike CODCr. Besides, despite of the increase of hybrid-recirculating system-recycle ratio, the deactivation of photo-catalytic activity was scarcely observed to eliminate the color while its irreversible deactivation was observed to eliminate CODCr.
Keywords:Authentic Textile-dyeing Wastewater;Fluidized Biofilter;Photocatalytic Reactor;Hybrid Recirculating System;COD;Color
  1. Sahunin C, Kaewboran J, Hunsom M, Sci. Asia, 32, 181 (2006)
  2. Ozturk E, Yetis U, Dilek FB, Demirer GN, J. Clean. Prod., 17, 239 (2009)
  3. Eren Z, J. Environ. Manage., 104, 127 (2012)
  4. Jin XC, Liu GQ, Xu ZH, Tao WY, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 74(1), 239 (2007)
  5. Kalra SS, Mohan S, Sinha A, Singh G, “Advance Oxidation Processes for Treatment of Textile and Dye Wastewater: a Review,” 2nd International Conference on Environmental Science and Development, Singapore (2011)
  6. Yeh RYL, Hung YT, Liu RLH, Chiu HM, Thomas A, Int. J. Environ. Stud., 59, 607 (2002)
  7. Alinsafi A, Khemis M, Pons MN, Leclerc JP, Yaacoubi A, Benhammou A, Nejmeddine A, Chem. Eng. Process., 44(4), 461 (2005)
  8. Metivier-Pignon H, Faur-Brasquet C, Jaouen P, Le Cloirec P, Environ. Technol., 24, 735 (2003)
  9. Paprowicz J, Słodczyk S, Environ. Technol. Lett., 9, 271 (1988)
  10. Wu CH, Kuo CY, Chang CL, J. Hazard. Mater., 153(3), 1052 (2008)
  11. Fahmi Nishihima W, Okada M, “Improvement of DOC Removal by Multi-stage AOP Biodegradation Process,” Enviro 2002 & IWA 3rd World Water Conference, Melbourne, Australia (2002)
  12. Scheck CK, Frimmel FH, Water Res., 29(10), 2346 (1995)
  13. Yang SY, Wang P, Yang X, Shan L, Zhang WY, Shao XT, Niu R, J. Hazard. Mater., 179(1-3), 552 (2010)
  14. Chang SH, Chuang SH, Li HC, Liang HH, Huang LC, J. Hazard. Mater., 166(2-3), 1279 (2009)
  15. Peternel IT, Koprivanac N, Bozic AML, Kugic HM, J. Hazard. Mater., 148(1-2), 477 (2007)
  16. Akyol A, Bayramoglu M, Chem. Eng. Process., 47(12), 2150 (2008)
  17. Zhang YG, Ma LL, Li JL, Yu Y, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 6264 (2007)
  18. Lim KH, Jung YJ, Park LS, Min KS, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 39(5), 600 (2001)
  19. Lee HW, Lim DJ, Textile Coloration and Finishing, 22(2), 145 (2010)
  20. Lee EJ, Lim DJ, Lee EY, Lim KH, “Treatment of Dye-wastewater Utilizing Fluidized Biofilter System,” 2002 KIChE Fall Meeting, Seoul, Korea (2002)
  21. Lee EJ, Lim KH, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 46(9), 636 (2013)
  22. Muruganandham M, Swaminathan M, Dyes. Pigm., 68, 133 (2006)