화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korean Journal of Materials Research, Vol.18, No.6, 326-333, June, 2008
Zr-Sn-Fe-Cr 및 Zr-Nb-Sn-Fe 합금 피복관의 기계적 특성 및 Creep 거동
Mechanical Properties and Creep Behaviors of Zr-Sn-Fe-Cr and Zr-Nb-Sn-Fe Alloy Cladding Tubes
E-mail:
Since the 1990s, the second generation of Zirconium alloys containing main alloy compositions of Nb, Sn and Fe have been used as a replacement of Zircaloy-4 (Zr-Sn-Fe-Cr), a first-generation Zirconium alloy, to meet severe and rigorous reactor operating conditions characterized by high-burn-up, high-power and high-pH operations. In this study, the mechanical properties and creep behaviors of Zr-Sn-Fe-Cr and Zr-Nb-Sn-Fe alloys were investigated in a temperature range of 450~500oC and in a stress range of 80~150MPa. The mechanical testing results indicate that the yield and tensile strengths of the Zr-Nb-Sn-Fe alloy are slightly higher compared to those of Zr-Sn-Fe-Cr. This can be explained by the second phase strengthening of the β-Nb precipitates. The creep test results indicate that the stress exponent for the steady-state creep rate decreases with the increase in the applied stress. However, the stress exponent of the Zr-Sn-Fe-Cr alloy is lower than that of the Zr-Nb-Sn-Fe alloy in a relatively high stress range, whereas the creep activation energy of the former is slightly higher than that of the latter. This can be explained by the dynamic deformation aging effect caused by the interaction of dislocations with Sn substitutional atoms. A higher Sn content leads to a lower stress exponent value and higher creep activation energy.
  1. Kohn E, ASTM STP, Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry, 633, 402 (1977)
  2. Lee KW, Kim SK, Kim KT, Hong SI, J. Nucl. Mater., 295, 21 (2001)
  3. Ivanov OS, Grigorovitch UK, Genova, Second International Conference on Peaceful Uses of Atomic energy, 5, 34 (1958)
  4. Mcinteer WA, David L, Baty, Stein KO, ASTM STP, Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry, 1023, 621 (1989)
  5. Cox B, Lundin CE, Proceedings of the USAEC Syposium on Zirconium Alloy Development, p.9 Castlaewood, Pleasanton, Califonia, (1962). (1962)
  6. Franklin DG, Lucas GE, Bement AL, Creep of Zirconium Alloy in Nuclear Reactors, p.183, ASTM, (1993). (1993)
  7. Linga Murty K, Ravi, Wiratmo J, Nuclear Enginerring and Design., 156, 359 (1995)
  8. Weertman J, Trans. AIME, 218, 207 (1960)
  9. Lubahn JD, Felgar RP, Plasticity and Creep of Metals, p.210, wiley, (1961). (1961)
  10. Murty KL, Clevinger GS, Papazogloa TP, Trans, of the 4th Int. Conf. on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, p.C3/4, Vol C, SF, CA, (1977). (1977)
  11. Hong SI, Mater. Sci. Eng., 86, 211 (1987)
  12. Hong SI, Mater. Sci. Eng., 64, L19 (1984)
  13. Hong SI, Mater. Sci. Eng., 91, 137 (1987)
  14. Hong SI, Mater. Sci. Eng., 82, 175 (1986)
  15. Hong SI, Mater. Sci. Eng., 79, 1 (1986)
  16. Oikawa H, Honda K, Ito S, Mater. Sci. Eng., 64, 237 (1984)
  17. Zhoy Y, Devarajan B, Murty KL, Nuclear Enginerring and Design., 228, 3 (2004)
  18. Park JY, Kim HG, Jeong YH, Jung YH, J. Nucl. Mater., 335, 433 (2004)
  19. Sabol GP, Kilp GR, Balfour MG, Roberts E, ASTM STP, Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry, 1023, 227 (1989)
  20. Northwood DO, Meng X, Warr BO, ASTM STP, 1132, 156 (1991)