화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.24, 276-283, April, 2015
Effects of spray-deposited oxidized multi-wall carbon nanotubes and graphene on pool-boiling critical heat flux enhancement
E-mail:
This paper examines the differences in critical heat flux (CHF) based on multi-wall carbon nanotubes and graphene have been found as new heat-transfer materials which are carbon allotropes with different shapes. The analysis of experimental data and results of calculations in pool-boiling critical heat flux experiments by spray-depositing oxidized multi-wall carbon nanotubes and graphene onto heat-transfer samples have been done to improve the economic efficiency and safety of the heat-transfer apparatus. The results show that the contact angle of the heat-transfer surface linearly decreased with spray deposition time, which resulted in an increased critical heat flux. The oxidized multi-wall carbon nanotubes and graphene showed maximum pool-boiling heat-transfer coefficients at 19.8° and 21.7°, respectively, while the pool-boiling heat-transfer coefficients decreased at angles of 9.9° or less and 12.5° or less, respectively. Also, the following new correction formula has been derived and compared with a current model by introducing a correction factor to Kandlikar's prediction model.
  1. Chowdhury SKR, Winterton RHS, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 28(10), 1881 (1985)
  2. Liter SG, Kaviany M, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 44(22), 4287 (2001)
  3. Hahne E, Diesselhorst T, Hydrodynamic and surface on the peak heat flux in pool boiling, in: Proceeding of Sixth International Heat Transfer Conference, Toronto, (1978), p. 1.
  4. Liaw SP, Dhir VK, Effect of surface wettability on transition boiling heat transfer from a vertical surface, in: Proceeding of Eighth International Heat Transfer Conference, 1986, p. 2031, 4.
  5. Kim HD, Kim MH, Appl. Phys. Lett., 91, 014104 (2007)
  6. Kim HD, Kim J, Kim MH, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 33(7), 691 (2007)
  7. Kim SJ, Bang IC, Buongiorno J, Hu LW, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 50(19-20), 4105 (2007)
  8. Golubovic MN, Hettiarachchi HDM, Worek WM, Minkowycz WJ, Appl. Therm. Eng., 29, 1281 (2009)
  9. Park SD, Lee SW, Kang S, Kim SM, Bang IC, Nucl. Eng. Des., 252, 184 (2012)
  10. Phan HT, Caney N, Marty P, Colasson S, Gavillet J, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 52, 5459 (2009)
  11. Truong B, Hu LW, Buongiorno J, McKrell T, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 53(1-3), 85 (2010)
  12. Ahn HS, et al., Nucl. Eng. Des., 240, 3350 (2010)
  13. Ahn HS, Kim JM, Kim MH, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 60, 763 (2013)
  14. Kandlikar SG, ASME J. Heat Transfer, 123, 1071 (2001)
  15. Hwang Y, Lee JK, Lee CH, Jung YM, Cheong SI, Lee CG, Ku BC, Jang SP, Thermochim. Acta, 455(2007), 70 (2007)
  16. Walvekar R, Faris IA, Khalid M, Heat Transfer Asian Res., 41, 145 (2012)
  17. Harish S, Ishikawa K, Einarsson E, Aikawa S, Inoue T, Zhao P, Watanabe M, Chiashi S, Shiomi J, Maruyama S, Mater. ExpressV, 2, 213 (2012)
  18. Yu W, Xie H, Wang X, Wang X, Phys. Lett. A, 375, 1323 (2011)
  19. Zuber N, ASME Trans., 80, 711 (1958)
  20. Kline SJ, McClintock FA, Mech. Eng., 75, 3 (1953)