화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korean Journal of Materials Research, Vol.26, No.7, 353-358, July, 2016
고압 수소 가스 하 인장 시험을 이용한 두 오스테나이트계 고망간강의 수소취화 특성 평가
Hydrogen Embrittlement of Two Austenitic High-Manganese Steels Using Tensile Testing under High-Pressure Gaseous Hydrogen
E-mail:
The hydrogen embrittlement of two austenitic high-manganese steels was investigated using tensile testing under high-pressure gaseous hydrogen. The test results were compared with those of different kinds of austenitic alloys containing Ni, Mn, and N in terms of stress and ductility. It was found that the ultimate tensile stress and ductility were more remarkably decreased under high-pressure gaseous hydrogen than under high-pressure gaseous argon, unlike the yield stress. In the specimens tested under high-pressure gaseous hydrogen, transgranular fractures were usually observed together with intergranular cracking near the fracture surface, whereas in those samples tested under high-pressure gaseous argon, ductile fractures mostly occurred. The austenitic high-manganese steels showed a relatively lower resistance to hydrogen embrittlement than did those with larger amounts of Ni because the formation of deformation twins or microbands in austenitic highmanganese steels probably promoted planar slip, which is associated with localized deformation due to gaseous hydrogen.
  1. Michler T, Yukhimchuk AA, Naumann J, Corrosion Sci., 50, 3519 (2008)
  2. Bae DS, Sung CE, Bang HJ, Lee SP, Lee JK, Son IS, Cho YR, Baek UB, Nahm SH, Met. Mater. Int., 20, 653 (2014)
  3. Zhang L, Wen M, Imade M, Fukuyama S, Yokogawa K, Acta Mater., 56, 3414 (2008)
  4. Omura T, Nakamura J, ISIJ Int., 52, 234 (2012)
  5. Han G, He S, Fukuyama S, Yokogawa K, Acta Mater., 46, 4559 (1998)
  6. Michler T, Naumann J, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 33(8), 2111 (2008)
  7. Kim YH, Kim JH, Hwang TH, Lee JY, Kang CY, Met. Mater. Int., 21, 485 (2015)
  8. Kim B, Trang TTT, Kim HJ, Met. Mater. Int., 20, 35 (2014)
  9. Hwang B, Lee TH, Park SJ, Oh CS, Kim SJ, Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 528, 7257 (2011)
  10. Michler T, San Marchi C, Naumann J, Weber S, Martin M, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 37(21), 16231 (2012)
  11. Phaniraj MP, Kim HJ, Suh JY, Shim JH, Park SJ, Lee TH, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 40(39), 13635 (2015)
  12. Jung JE, Park J, Kim JS, Jeon JB, Kim SK, Chang YW, Met. Mater. Int., 20, 27 (2014)
  13. Jo M, Koo YM, Kwon SK, Met. Mater. Int., 21, 227 (2015)
  14. Dumay A, Chateau JP, Allain S, Migot S, Bouaziz O, Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 483, 184 (2008)
  15. Mazancova E, Mazanec K, Mater. Eng., 16, 26 (2009)
  16. ASTM Standard G142-98, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, (2011).
  17. De Cooman BC, Kim JK, Chin KH, High Mn TWIP Steels for Automotive Applications, INTECH Open Access Publisher (2011).
  18. Troiano AR, Trans. ASM, 52, 54 (1960)
  19. Beachem CD, Metall. Trans., 3, 437 (1972)
  20. Marchi CS, Michler T, Nibur KA, Somerday BP, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 35(18), 9736 (2010)
  21. Martin M, Weber S, Theisen W, Michler T, Naumann J, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 36(24), 15888 (2011)
  22. Gavriljuk VG, Shyvanyuk VN, Teus SM, Mater. Sci. Forum, 638, 104 (2010)