화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korea-Australia Rheology Journal, Vol.28, No.4, 281-300, November, 2016
Simultaneous pulsatile flow and oscillating wall of a non-Newtonian liquid
E-mail:
In this work, analytical predictions of the rectilinear flow of a non-Newtonian liquid are given. The fluid is subjected to a combined flow: A pulsatile time-dependent pressure gradient and a random longitudinal vibration at the wall acting simultaneously. The fluctuating component of the combined pressure gradient and oscillating flow is assumed to be of small amplitude and can be adequately represented by a weakly stochastic process, for which a quasi-static perturbation solution scheme is suggested, in terms of a small parameter. This flow is analyzed with the Tanner constitutive equation model with the viscosity function represented by the Ellis model. According to the coupled Tanner-Ellis model, the flow enhancement can be separated in two contributions (pulsatile and oscillating mechanisms) and the power requirement is always positive and can be interpreted as the sum of a pulsatile, oscillating, and the coupled systems respectively. Both expressions depend on the amplitude of the oscillations, the perturbation parameter, the exponent of the Ellis model (associated to the shear thinning or thickening mechanisms), and the Reynolds and Deborah numbers. At small wall stress values, the flow enhancement is dominated by the axial wall oscillations whereas at high wall stress values, the system is governed by the pulsating noise perturbation. The flow transition is obtained for a critical shear stress which is a function of the Reynolds number, dimensionless frequency and the ratio of the two amplitudes associated with the pulsating and oscillating perturbations. In addition, the flow enhancement is compared with analytical and numerical predictions of the Reiner-Phillipoff and Carreau models. Finally, the flow enhancement and power requirement are predicted using biological rheometric data of blood with low cholesterol content.
  1. Abou-Dakka M, Herrera-Valencia EE, Rey AD, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 185-186, 1 (2012)
  2. Anand M, Rajagopal KR, Int. J. Cardiovasc. Med. Sci., 4, 59 (2004)
  3. Bird RB, Armstrong RC, Hassager O, 1977, Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids, Vol 1. Fluid Mechanics, Wiley, New York.
  4. Calderas F, Sanchez-Solis A, Maciel A, Manero O, Macromol. Symp., 283-284, 354 (2009)
  5. Calderas F, Herrera-Valencia EE, Sanchez-Olivares G, Manero O, 2012, Rheological theory and simulation of complex liquid, In: Petrova VM, eds., Advances in Engineering Research, Volume 3, Nova Science Publishers, New York, 201-258.
  6. Lima LRPD, Rey AD, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 135(1), 32 (2006)
  7. Rio D, de Haro JAML, Whitaker S, Phys. Rev. E, 58, 6323 (1998)
  8. Herrera EE, Calderas F, Chavez AE, Manero O, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 165(3-4), 174 (2010)
  9. Herrera EE, Calderas F, Chavez AE, Manero O, Mena B, Rheol. Acta, 48(7), 779 (2009)
  10. Moyers-Gonzalez MA, Owens RG, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 155(3), 146 (2008)
  11. Moyers-Gonzalez MA, Owens RG, Biorheology, 47, 39 (2010)
  12. Moyers-Gonzalez MA, Owens RG, Fang J, J. Fluid Mech., 617, 327 (2008)
  13. Moyers-Gonzalez MA, Owens RG, Fang JN, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 155(3), 161 (2008)
  14. Neofytou P, Tsangaris S, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 51, 489 (2006)
  15. Owens RG, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 140(1-3), 57 (2006)
  16. Phan-Thien N, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 4, 167 (1978)
  17. Phan-Thien N, Rheol. Acta, 19, 285 (290)
  18. Phan-Thien N, Rheol. Acta, 19, 539 (1980)
  19. Rey AD, Valencia EEH, Langmuir, 26(16), 13033 (2010)
  20. Rey AD, Herrera-Valencia EE, Biopolymers, 97, 374 (2012)
  21. Rey AD, Golmohammadi M, Herrera-Valencia EE, Soft Matter, 7, 5002 (2011)