화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.34, No.1, 259-265, January, 2017
High performance methyl orange capture on magnetic nanoporous MCM-41 prepared by incipient wetness impregnation method
E-mail:
The Magnetic nanoporous material Fe/MCM-41 was prepared, and its physical characterization studied, to determine the effect of its properties on separation efficiency of methyl orange (MO) from wastewater by adsorption process. The experimental results were analyzed for both adsorbent mesoporous material samples, MCM-41 and magnetic Fe/MCM-41, in order to select the best operating conditions for the different studied parameters, which are: constant temperature (20 °C), pH: (2) adsorbent dosage (0.03 gm), contact time (10minute) and concentrations (30mg/L). The results demonstrate that the adsorption processes can be well fitted by the Langmuir isotherm model for pure MCM-41, with a correlation coefficient of (0.999), and fitted by the Freundlich isotherm model for magnetic Fe/MCM-41, with a correlation coefficient of (0.994). The adsorption kinetics of MO on to MCM-41 and Fe/MCM-41 are well described by a pseudo-second-order kinetic model.
  1. Rodriguez A, Garcia J, Ovejero G, Mestanza M, J. Hazard. Mater., 172, 1311 (2012)
  2. Forgacs E, Cserhati T, Oros G, Environ. Int., 30, 953 (2009)
  3. Alsalhy QF, Albyati TM, Zablouk MA, Chem. Eng. Commun., 200(1), 1 (2013)
  4. Albayati TM, Doyle AM, Adsorpt. Sci. Technol., 31(5), 459 (2013)
  5. Albayati TM, Doyle AM, Chem.: Bulgarian J. Sci. Education, 23(1), 105 (2014)
  6. Al-Bayati TM, Part. Sci. Technol., 32(6), 616 (2014)
  7. Sabri AA, Albayati TM, Alazawi RA, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 32(9), 1835 (2015)
  8. Babel S, Kurniawan TA, J. Hazard. Mater., 97(1-3), 219 (2003)
  9. Gupta VK, J. Environ. Manage., 90, 2313 (2009)
  10. Lu AH, Li WC, Kiefer A, Schmidt W, Bill E, Fink G, Schuth F, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126(28), 8616 (2004)
  11. Wu PG, Zhu JH, Xu ZH, Adv. Funct. Mater., 14(4), 345 (2004)
  12. Huang S, Yang P, Cheng Z, Li C, Fan Y, Kong D, Lin J, J. Phys. Chem. C, 112, 7130 (2008)
  13. Giri S, Trewyn BG, Stellmaker MP, Lin VS, Angew. Chem.-Int. Edit., 44, 5038 (2005)
  14. Deng Y, Qi D, Deng C, Zhang X, Zhao D, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 130(1), 28 (2008)
  15. Xingbin Y, Jiangtao C, Qunji X, Philippe M, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 135, 137 (2010)
  16. Chen H, Wang Y, Ceram. Int., 28, 541 (2002)
  17. Albayati TM, Doyle AM, J. Nanopart. Res., 17(2), 109 (2015)
  18. Langmuir I, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 38(11), 2221 (1916)
  19. Weber WJ, Chakravorti RK, J. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng., 20, 228 (1974)
  20. Chen M, Chen Y, Diao GW, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 55(11), 5109 (2010)
  21. Freundlich HM, Colloid Capillary Chemistry, 3(12), 1454 (1926)
  22. Freundlich HM, Z. Phys. Chem., 57A, 385 (1906)
  23. Ling YH, Long MC, Hu PD, Chen Y, Huang JW, J. Hazard. Mater., 264, 195 (2014)
  24. Chen XQ, Lam KF, Yeung KL, Chem. Eng. J., 172(2-3), 728 (2011)
  25. Ursachi I, Stancu A, Vasile A, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 377, 184 (2012)
  26. Liu BS, Xu DF, Chu JX, Liu W, Au CT, Energy Fuels, 21(1), 250 (2007)
  27. Chen XQ, Arruebo M, Yeung KL, Catal. Today, 204, 140 (2013)
  28. Weijia Z, Wenhe SZ, Yingjun W, Hongshi Z, Zhengmao L, Shunpu Y, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 321, 1025 (2009)
  29. Yujin L, Kunyan S, Rongzhan L, Xin Z, Yang Z, Hongchao L, Yanzhi X, Energy Procedia, 61, 863 (2012)
  30. Rengaraj S, Joo CK, Kim Y, Yi J, J. Hazard. Mater., 102(2-3), 257 (2003)
  31. Tang J, Yang ZF, Yi YJ, Procedia Environ. Sci., 13, 2179 (2012)
  32. Meng Q, Zhang X, He C, Zhou P, Su W, Duan C, Talanta, 84, 53 (2011)
  33. Ruihua H, Qian L, Jie H, Bingchao Y, Arabian J. Chem., DOI:10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.05.017. (2013)
  34. Fang-Chang T, Ning M, Tai-Chin C, Lung-Chang T, Jing-Jing S, Xia AY, Jiang T, Shuenn-Kung S, Fu-Sheng C, J. Water Process Eng., 1, 2 (2014)
  35. Tonghao L, Yanhui L, Qiuju D, Jiankun S, Yuqin J, Guangming Y, Zonghua W, Yanzhi X, Wei Z, Kunlin W, Hongwei Z, Dehai W, Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces, 90, 197 (2012)
  36. Yao YJ, He B, Xu FF, Chen XF, Chem. Eng. J., 170(1), 82 (2011)