In a recent publication (SAG 2015), we presented a non-conventional HPGR-Ball mill circuit as a lower capital cost alternative to the "standard" HPGR circuit. The circuit was designed for the treatment of a hard ore and relatively high tonnage (50,000 t/d). That paper provided details such as flowsheets, layouts, and equipment lists for the two options and compared their calculated capital costs demonstrating significant savings for the proposed circuit. This paper extends the analysis to a third option, a traditional SABC circuit, giving the same level of details and now including the operating cost estimates for all three options for a more comprehensive analysis. Moreover, this work also provides information about the strengths and weaknesses of the non-conventional HPGR circuit when compared to the "standard" HPGR option. This study demonstrates that the proposed non-conventional HPGR-based circuit not only provides a lower overall capital costs for the project if compared to a "standard" HPGR circuit but also brings the capital cost to the level of the traditional SAG-Ball mill circuits. In addition, the innovative HPGR circuit provides similar operational cost savings of the "standard" HPGR and thus a significant advantage when compared to the SAG option. With the current capital cost sensitivity for most greenftld projects, the proposed alternative circuit should help make HPGR-based circuits more competitive and thus promote the utilization of a technology that enables higher energy efficiency and reduced greenhouse gas emissions. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.