화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.34, No.5, 1524-1530, May, 2017
DOI10.1007/s11814-017-0030-4  Export Citation
In situ mass spectrometry of glucose decomposition under hydrothermal reactions
Pattasuda Duangkaew, Shuhei Inoue1, Tsunehiro Aki2, Yutaka Nakashimada2, Yoshiko Okamura2, Takahisa Tajima2, and Yukihiko Matsumura1, †
  • Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, 1-4-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, 739-8527, Japan
  • 1Division of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Hiroshima University, 1-4-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, 739-8527, Japan
  • 2Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Graduate School of Advanced Sciences of Matter, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, 739-8530, Japan
E-mail:
We designed an in situ mass spectrometry (in situ MS) analysis method and developed to identify the products of glucose decomposition under hydrothermal condition for the first time. The in situ MS analysis was performed by coupling a tubular batch reactor with a quadrupole mass analyzer via custom-built connection fittings. The products of glucose decomposition were investigated by in situ MS, mass spectrometry of cold effluent, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of cold effluent and the results were compared. At 140 °C, in situ MS and mass spectrometry of cold effluent showed that the decomposition of glucose does not proceed; this was confirmed by comparison with the mass spectral database for glucose. At 180 °C or higher, a clear base fragmentation peak of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) at position m/z 97 and that of furfural at m/z 96, formic acid (m/z=46) and levulinic acid (m/z=116) were observed by mass spectrometry. No levulinic acid or furfural was observed through conventional HPLC analysis under any condition; only glucose, formic acid, and 5-HMF could be detected. The effectiveness of in situ MS analysis is clear, compared to mass spectrometry analysis of cold effluent and HPLC analysis.
Keywords:In Situ Analysis;Mass Spectrometry;Glucose;Hydrothermal Reaction;Quadrupole Mass Analyzer
  1. Chen H, Zhou D, Luo G, Zhang S, Chen J, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 47, 427 (2015)
  2. Song M, Duc Pham H, Seon J, Woo HC, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 50, 782 (2015)
  3. Wei N, Quarterman J, Jin YS, Trends Biotechnol., 31, 70 (2013)
  4. Knezevic D, van Swaaij WPM, Kersten SRA, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48(10), 4731 (2009)
  5. Cao XF, Peng XW, Sun SN, Zhong LX, Chen W, Wang S, Sun RC, Carbohydr. Polym., 118, 44 (2015)
  6. Joshi SS, Zodge AD, Pandare KV, Kulkarni BD, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 53(49), 18796 (2014)
  7. Blazso M, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 74, 344 (2005)
  8. Patwardhan PR, Satrio JA, Brown RC, Shanks BH, Bioresour. Technol., 101(12), 4646 (2010)
  9. Alif MF, Matsumoto K, Kitagawa K, Microchem J., 99, 394 (2011)
  10. Hurt MR, Degenstein JC, Gawecki P, Borton DJ, Vinueza NR, Yang L, Agrawal R, Delgass WN, Ribeiro FH, Kenttamaa HI, Anal. Chem., 85, 10927 (2013)
  11. Kano H, Okamoto T, Kitagawa S, Iiguni Y, Ohtani H, Ito H, Iwai K, Kuno M, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 113, 165 (2015)
  12. Piskorz J, Majerski P, Radlein D, Vladars-Usas A, Scott DS, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 56, 145 (2000)
  13. Lin YC, Cho J, Tompsett GA, Westmoreland PR, Huber GW, J. Phys. Chem. C, 113, 20097 (2009)
  14. Sharpe FR, Chappell CG, J. I. Brewing, 96, 381 (1990)
  15. Yu Y, Shafie ZM, Wu HW, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52(47), 17006 (2013)
  16. Yu Y, Song B, Long Y, Wu HW, Energy Fuels, 30(10), 8787 (2016)
  17. Yoshida T, Yanachi S, Matsumura Y, J. Jpn. Inst. Energy, 86, 700 (2007)
  18. Matsumura Y, Yanachi S, Yoshida T, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45(6), 1875 (2006)
  19. Promdej C, Matsumura Y, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50(14), 8492 (2011)
  20. Kabyemela BM, Adschiri T, Malaluan RM, Arai K, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38(8), 2888 (1999)
  21. Kabyemela BM, Adschiri T, Malaluan RM, Arai K, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 36(5), 1552 (1997)