A major drawback to ultrafiltration membrane operation for drinking water treatment is fouling, which results in lower water production and increased maintenance costs. The impact of different fouling mitigation strategies including, sparging conditions (duration and air flow rate) as well as phased in-line coagulation were investigated at pilot-scale. Unexpectedly, sparging during permeation and backwash resulted in a significantly higher rate of increase in irreversible resistance compared to Sparging only during backwash. Lower irreversible fouling observed without sparging during permeation was attributed to the formation of a protective layer on the membrane in the absence of sparging. Sparging at reduced air flow rates and intermittently, during the permeation cycle did not improve the irreversible resistance rate when compared to sparging only during backwash. The application of phased in-line coagulation to pre-coat membranes was also investigated. Coagulating for only the first half of the permeation cycle (phased coagulation) did not negatively impact membrane performance in terms of irreversible resistance and organics removal. Phased coagulation, which would lead to reduced coagulant and sludge disposal costs, appears to be a promising fouling control strategy. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.