화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.35, No.1, 20-33, January, 2018
A new approach to developing a conceptual topside process design for an offshore platform
E-mail:
This study introduces a new approach for the conceptual design of an offshore topside process, satisfying environmental standards, saving utility consumption, and consequently, maximizing economic profit. Twelve individual processes are modeled as a case study, based on sets of combinations between four topside process configurations and three individual production scenarios (i.e., peak oil, peak gas, and peak water) over the life cycle of an oil reservoir. Then, the simulation results of these models are analyzed based on economic profit. In particular, the simulation program is integrated with a mixed-integer non-linear programming algorithm to optimize the design and operating variables (e.g., operating pressures of the multi-stage separators) in order to maximize the economic profit of the platform. Lastly, an economic feasibility study is performed for the design of a profitable and eco-friendly offshore platform.
  1. KEMCO, http://www.energy.or.kr/web/kem_home_new/energy_issue/mail_vol19/pdf/publish_02_201506.pdf (2015).
  2. Conti J, International Energy Outlook 2016, U.S. Energy Information Administration, U.S.A. (2016).
  3. Oil price, http://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Gulf-Of-Mexico-Breakeven-Falls-Below-50-Per-Barrel.html (2017).
  4. Bahadori A, Vuthaluru HB, Mokhatab S, ASIA-PACIFIC J. Chem. Eng., 3, 380 (2008)
  5. Al-Ameeri RS, Middle East Tech. Conf. Exhib. (2013).
  6. Kim IH, Dan S, Kim H, Rim HR, Lee JM, Yoon ES, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 53(21), 8810 (2014)
  7. IFP school, http://www.ifp-school.com/upload/docs/application/pdf/2015-02/3_main_steps_oil_gas_field_development.pdf (2015).
  8. Nguyen TV, Fulop TG, Breuhaus P, Elmegaard B, Energy, 73, 282 (2014)
  9. Nordvag OK, Master’s Thesis, NTNU, Norway (2012).
  10. Malhotra R, Singh N, Singh Y, Comput. Inf. Sci., 4, 39 (2011)
  11. Ashour I, Al-Rawahi N, Fatemi A, Vakili-Nezhaad G, Applications of Equations of State in the Oil and Gas Industry, InTech (2011).
  12. Kylling Ø, Master’s Thesis, Institutt for teknisk kybernetikk, Norway (2009).
  13. Fulgueras AM, Poudel J, Kim DS, Cho J, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 33(1), 46 (2016)
  14. Moghadam N, Samadi M, Int. J. Chem. Eng. Appl., 3, 461 (2012)
  15. Lidderdale T, Fuel Technol. Manage., 6, 47 (1999)
  16. Isa MA, Eldemerdash U, Nasrifar K, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 91(9), 1731 (2013)
  17. Vafajoo L, Ganjian K, Fattahi M, J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 90, 107 (2012)
  18. Huang D, Allen TT, Notz WI, Zeng N, J. Glob. Optim., 34, 441 (2006)
  19. Aspelund A, Gundersen T, Myklebust J, Nowak MP, Tomasgard A, Comput. Chem. Eng., 34(10), 1606 (2010)
  20. Park S, Lee Y, Kim G, Hwang S, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 33(12), 3417 (2016)
  21. IEA, http://www.iea.org/media/statistics/surveys/prices/mps.pdf (2017).
  22. IEA, https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/rngwhhdd.htm (2017).
  23. IEA, https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/pdf/epm.pdf (2017).
  24. Yeniay O, Math. Comput. Appl., 10, 45 (2005)
  25. Manning FS, Thompson RE, Oilfield processing of petroleum: Crude oil (Vol. 2), Pennwell books, 167 (1995).
  26. EIA, Engineering Economic Analysis Guide : Liquid Fuels Technologies, U.S. Energy Information Administration, U.S.A. (2015).
  27. AspenTech, Aspen Capital Cost Estimator User’s Guide, Aspen Technology, Inc., U.S.A. (2012).
  28. Permatasari A, Fasahati P, Ryu JH, Liu JJ, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 33(12), 3381 (2016)
  29. YCHARTS, https://ycharts.com/indicators/japan_liquefied_natural_gas_import_price (2017).