화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.35, No.2, 421-427, February, 2018
Reduction of CO2 to CO via reverse water-gas shift reaction over CeO2 catalyst
E-mail:
CeO2 catalysts with different structure were prepared by hard-template (Ce-HT), complex (Ce-CA), and precipitation methods (Ce-PC), and their performance in CO2 reverse water gas shift (RWGS) reaction was investigated. The catalysts were characterized using XRD, TEM, BET, H2-TPR, and in-situ XPS. The results indicated that the structure of CeO2 catalysts was significantly affected by the preparation method. The porous structure and large specific surface area enhanced the catalytic activity of the studied CeO2 catalysts. Oxygen vacancies as active sites were formed in the CeO2 catalysts by H2 reduction at 400 °C. The Ce-HT, Ce-CA, and Ce-PC catalysts have a 100% CO selectivity and CO2 conversion at 580 °Cwas 15.9%, 9.3%, and 12.7%, respectively. The highest CO2 RWGS reaction catalytic activity for the Ce-HT catalyst was related to the porous structure, large specific surface area (144.9m2.g -1) and formed abundant oxygen vacancies.
  1. Centi G, Quadrelli EA, Perathoner S, Energy Environ. Sci., 6, 1711 (2013)
  2. Zhou GL, Dai BC, Xie HM, Zhang GZ, Xiong K, Zheng XX, J. CO2 Utilization, 21, 292 (2017)
  3. Ahmad H, Kamarudin SK, Minggu LJ, Kassim M, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 43, 599 (2015)
  4. Yoshihara J, Campbell CT, J. Catal., 161(2), 776 (1996)
  5. Osaki T, Narita N, Horiuchi T, Masuda H, Suzuki K, Sugiyama T, J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem., 125, 63 (1997)
  6. Park SW, Joo OS, Jung KD, Kim H, Han SH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 17(6), 719 (2000)
  7. Park SW, Joo OS, Jung KD, Kim H, Han SH, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 211(1), 81 (2001)
  8. Kim DH, Han SW, Yoon HS, Kim YD, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 23, 67 (2015)
  9. Imagawa H, Suda A, Yamamura K, Sun SH, J. Phys. Chem., 115, 1740 (2011)
  10. Dai BC, Zhou GL, Ge SB, Xie HM, Jiao ZJ, Zhang GZ, Xiong K, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 95(4), 634 (2017)
  11. Wang LC, Khazaneh MT, Widmann D, Behm RJ, J. Catal., 302, 20 (2013)
  12. Jiang QQ, Zhou GL, Jiang ZX, Li C, Sol. Energy, 99, 55 (2014)
  13. Goguet A, Shekhtman SO, Burch R, Hardacre C, Meunier E, Yablonsky GS, J. Catal., 237(1), 102 (2006)
  14. Lu BW, Kawamoto K, Mater. Res. Bull., 53, 70 (2014)
  15. Goguet A, Shekhtman SO, Burch R, Hardacre C, Meunier E, Yablonsky GS, J. Catal., 237(1), 102 (2006)
  16. Goguet A, Meunier F, Breen JP, Burch R, Petch MI, Ghenciu AF, J. Catal., 226(2), 382 (2004)
  17. Zhou GL, Lan H, Wang H, Xie HM, Zhang GZ, Zheng XX, J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem., 393, 279 (2014)
  18. Zhou GL, Lan H, Yang XQ, Du QX, Xie HM, Fu M, Ceram. Int., 39, 3677 (2013)
  19. Zhou G, Gui B, Xie H, Yang F, Chen Y, Chen S, Zheng X, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 20(1), 160 (2014)
  20. Djinovic P, Batista J, Pintar A, Catal. Today, 147S, S191 (2009).
  21. Qu ZP, Yu FL, Zhang XD, Wang Y, Gao JS, Chem. Eng. J., 229, 522 (2013)
  22. Fu XC, Shen WX, Physical Chemistry, Fifth Ed., High education press, Beijing (2006).
  23. Lopez JM, Gilbank AL, Garcia T, Solsona B, Agouram S, Torrente-Murciano L, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 174-175, 403 (2015)
  24. Tana, Zhang ML, Li J, Li HJ, Li Y, Shen WJ, Catal. Today, 148(1-2), 179 (2009)
  25. Karpenko A, Leppelt R, Cai J, Plzak V, Chuvilin A, Kaiser U, Behm RJ, J. Catal., 250(1), 139 (2007)
  26. Choudhury B, Chetri P, Choudhury A, RSC Adv., 4, 4663 (2014)
  27. Nolan M, Parker SC, Watson GW, Surf. Sci., 595, 223 (2005)
  28. Meng LZ, Gong SL, He YB, Chemistry Organic Spectral Analysis, 3rd Ed., Wuhan University Press, Wuhan (2009).
  29. Kim SS, Park KH, Hong SC, Fuel Process. Technol., 108, 47 (2013)
  30. Chen CS, Cheng WH, Lin SS, Chem. Commun., 18, 1770 (2001)