화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.65, 380-386, September, 2018
Experimental study on reaction characteristics of NO in (NH4)2SO3 solution
E-mail:
The effects of various factors on the NO removal activity in the (NH4)2SO3 solution were investigated to explore more details and characteristics of the related reactions using full infrared sensor flue gas analyzer (FISFGA). It was found that the conversion yield of NO (9.0%.29.0%) was obviously improved with the increase of gas.liquid contact area, NO residence time and (NH4)2SO3 concentration as well as the adding of CuSO4. However, it was mainly limited by gas.liquid mass transfer rate and slightly inhibited by the gas velocity. Moreover, the FISFGA analysis revealed that two nitric oxide (NO) conversion route with different reduction product of N2O and N2 existed simultaneously upon the existence form of SO3 2-. It was confirmed by the calculations and the experiments of pH factor that the NO reduction steps were based on the following equation: (1) NO + HSO3- ⇋ N2O + SO4 2- + H+; (2) NO + SO3 2- ⇋ N2 + SO4 2-. In this system, Eq. (1) with N2O product was the major pathway, but the ratio of Eqs. (2) to (1) was intensified in the presence of CuSO4. It is believed that the suitable additives could promote the NO reduction to N2 furtherly.
  1. Ding J, Zhong Q, Zhang SL, Fuel Process. Technol., 128, 449 (2014)
  2. Dimitriades B, Environ. Sci. Technol., 6, 253 (1972)
  3. Novakov T, Chang SG, Harker AB, Science, 186, 259 (1974)
  4. Zhang SH, Cai LL, Mi XH, Jiang JL, Li W, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 3814 (2008)
  5. Baek JH, Lee SM, Park JH, Jeong JM, Hwang RH, Ko CH, Jeon SG, Choi TH, Yi KB, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 48, 194 (2017)
  6. Zhang Q, Zhang J, Song Z, Ning P, Li H, Liu X, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 34, 165 (2016)
  7. Wendt JOL, Linak WP, Groff PW, Srivastava RK, AIChE J., 47(11), 2603 (2001)
  8. Zhao W, Zhong Q, Pan YX, Zhang R, Chem. Eng. J., 228, 815 (2013)
  9. Zhao Y, Hao RL, Qi M, Chem. Eng. J., 269, 159 (2015)
  10. Amin NAS, Chong CM, Chem. Eng. J., 113(1), 13 (2005)
  11. Hikita H, Asai S, Ishikawa H, Okamoto T, Sakamoto S, Kitagawa M, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 11, 360 (1978)
  12. Eizo S, Hldehlro K, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 20, 46 (1980)
  13. Muzio LJ, Quartucy GC, Cichanowiczy JE, Int. J. Environ. Pollut., 17, 4 (2002)
  14. Barron CH, O’ Hern HA, Chem. Eng. Sci., 21, 397 (1966)
  15. Raju T, Chung SJ, Moon IS, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 7464 (2008)
  16. Miller MH, Agron. J., 57 (1965)
  17. Aleksic Z, Broeshart H, Middelboe V, Plant Soil, 29, 338 (1968)
  18. Nunes TL, Powell RE, Inorg. Chem., 9, 821 (1970)
  19. Takeuchi H, Ando M, Kizawa N, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 16, 303 (1977)
  20. Littlejohn D, Hu KY, Chang SG, Chem. Inf., 17 (1986)
  21. Sada E, Kumazawa H, Kudo I, Kondo T, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 19, 377 (1980)
  22. Sada E, Kumazawa H, Takada Y, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 23, 60 (1984)
  23. Sada E, Kumazawa H, Hikosaka H, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 25 (1986)
  24. Sada E, Kumazawa H, Machida H, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 26, 7 (1987)
  25. Ellchl N, Tsuglo S, Takuml S, Masatoshi I, Taljiro O, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 23, 262 (1984)
  26. Dong XY, Zhang Y, Zhou JT, Li N, Chen MX, Bioresour. Technol., 120, 127 (2012)
  27. Zhou Y, Xia YF, Li W, Gao L, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 657 (2013)
  28. Guo QB, He Y, Sun TH, Wang YL, Jia JP, J. Hazard. Mater., 276, 371 (2014)
  29. Wang L, Zhao WR, Wu ZB, Chem. Eng. J., 132(1-3), 227 (2007)
  30. Zhu HS, Mao YP, Yang XJ, Chen Y, Long XL, Yuan WK, Sep. Purif. Technol., 74(1), 1 (2010)
  31. Xiang K, Liu H, Yang B, Zhang C, Yang S, Liu Z, Liu C, Xie X, Chai L, Min X, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 23, 8113 (2016)
  32. Yan B, Yang J, Guo M, Chen G, Li Z, Ma S, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 20(4), 2528 (2014)
  33. Yan B, Yang J, Guo M, Zhu S, Yu W, Ma S, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 21, 476 (2015)
  34. Sun Y, Meng Y, Guo X, Zhu T, Liu H, Li W, J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manage., 1 (2016).