화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.36, No.2, 226-235, February, 2019
DOI10.1007/s11814-018-0190-x  Export Citation
Aminated cassava residue-based magnetic microspheres for Pb(II) adsorption from wastewater
Xinling Xie1, 2, Jie Huang1, Youquan Zhang1, †, Zhangfa Tong1, Anping Liao3, Xingkui Guo2, 4, Zuzeng Qin5, †, and Zhanhu Guo2, †
  • 1School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Resource Processing and Process Intensification Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, China
  • 2Integrated Composites Laboratory (ICL), Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37966, USA
  • 3Key Laboratory of Chemical and Biological Transformation Process of Guangxi Higher Education Institutes, Guangxi University for Nationalities, Nanning 530006, Guangxi, China
  • 4College of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
  • 5School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Resource Processing and Process Intensification Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, China
E-mail:, ,
Aminated cassava residue magnetic microspheres (ACRPM) were synthesized via an inverse emulsion method by using chemically modified cassava residue as a crude material, and acrylic acid (AA), acrylamide (AM), and methyl methacrylate (MMA) as monomers and a polyethylene glycol/methanol system (PEG/MeOH) as the porogen. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), N2 adsorption-desorption and vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) were used to characterize the ACRPM. The results indicated that amino groups were grafted to the cassava residue magnetic microspheres, and the Fe3O4 nanoparticles were encapsulated in the microspheres. After porogen was added, the particle size of the ACRPM decreased from 16.5 꺷m to 150 nm with a pore volume of 0.05510m3/g, and the specific surface area of the ACRPM increased from 3.02 to 12.34m2/g. The ACRPM were superparamagnetic, and the saturation magnetization was 9.8 emu/g. The maximum adsorption capacity of Pb(II) on the ACRPM was 390mg/g. The ACRPM exhibited a large specific surface area and provided many adsorption sites for metal ion adsorption, which favored a high adsorption capacity. Additionally, the Pb(II) adsorption process was fitted to pseudo-second-order kinetic and Langmuir isothermal adsorption models. This suggests that the Pb(II) adsorption process was dominated by a chemical reaction process and that chemisorption was the rate-controlling step during the Pb(II) removal process. In addition, the adsorbent exhibited good stability after six consecutive reuses.
Keywords:Aminated Cassava Residue;Magnetic Microspheres;Inverse Emulsion;Polyethylene Glycol/Methanol System;Pb(II);Adsorption
  1. Da'na E, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 247, 145 (2017)
  2. Tepanosyan G, Sahakyan L, Belyaeva O, Maghakyan N, Saghatelyan A, Chemosphere, 184, 1230 (2017)
  3. Ma JH, Liu YT, Ali O, Wei YF, Zhang SQ, Zhang YM, Cai T, Liu CB, Luo SL, J. Hazard. Mater., 344, 1034 (2018)
  4. Kurniawan TA, Chan GY, Lo WH, Babel S, Sci. Total Environ., 366, 409 (2006)
  5. Ma Y, Lv L, Guo Y, Fu Y, Shao Q, Wu T, Guo S, Sun K, Guo X, Wujcik EK, Guo Z, Poly, 128, 12 (2017)
  6. Huang JN, Cao YH, Shao J, Peng XF, Guo ZH, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 56(38), 10689 (2017)
  7. Garg UK, Kaur MP, Garg VK, Sud D, J. Hazard. Mater., 140(1-2), 60 (2007)
  8. Shariful MI, Sepehr T, Mehrali M, Ang BC, Amalina MA, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 135, 45851 (2018)
  9. Xu Z, Gao G, Pan B, Zhang W, Lv L, Water Res., 87, 378 (2015)
  10. Petrinic I, Korenak J, Povodnik D, Helix-Nielsen C, J. Clean Prod., 101, 292 (2015)
  11. Altmann J, Ruhl AS, Zietzschmann F, Jekel M, Water Res., 55, 185 (2014)
  12. Shaker MA, albishri HM, Chemosphere, 111, 587 (2014)
  13. Li N, Fu F, Lu J, Ding Z, Tang B, Pang J, Environ. Pollut., 220, 1376 (2017)
  14. Lv L, Chen N, Feng C, Zhang J, Li M, RSC Adv., 7, 27992 (2017)
  15. Dang HC, Yuan X, Xiao Q, Xiao WX, Luo YK, Wang XL, Song F, Wang YZ, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 5, 4505 (2017)
  16. Noor NM, Othman R, Mubarak NM, Abdullah EC, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 78, 168 (2017)
  17. Park W, Gordon AC, Cho S, Huang X, Harris KR, Larson AC, Kim DH, ACS Appl. Mater. Inter., 9, 13819 (2017)
  18. Rodkate N, Rutnakornpituk M, Carbohydr. Polym., 151, 251 (2016)
  19. Zhang XY, Zhang N, Du CB, Guan P, Gao XM, Wang CY, Du YF, Ding SC, Hu XL, Chem. Eng. J., 317, 988 (2017)
  20. Hu Z, Shao Q, Moloney MG, Xu XR, Zhang DY, Li J, Zhang CH, Huang YD, Macromolecules, 50(4), 1422 (2017)
  21. Zhu WJ, Ma W, Li CX, Pan JM, Dai XH, Chem. Eng. J., 276, 249 (2015)
  22. Liu J, Wu HT, Lu JF, Wen XY, Kan J, Jin CH, Chem. Eng. J., 262, 803 (2015)
  23. Xie J, Zhong G, Cai C, Chen C, Chen X, Talanta, 169, 98 (2017)
  24. Huang J, Su P, Zhou L, Yang Y, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 490, 241 (2016)
  25. Pingmuanglek P, Jakrawatana N, Gheewala SH, J. Clean Prod., 162, 1075 (2017)
  26. Jiang HY, Qin Y, Gadow SI, Li YY, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 42(5), 2868 (2017)
  27. Lu HS, Lv CL, Zhang MH, Liu SY, Liu JT, Lian F, Energy Conv. Manag., 132, 251 (2017)
  28. Cheng J, Zhang JB, Lin RC, Liu JZ, Zhang L, Cen KF, Bioresour. Technol., 228, 348 (2017)
  29. Xie X, Xiong H, Zhang Y, Tong Z, Liao A, Qin Z, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 5, 2800 (2017)
  30. Garcia AR, Lacko C, Snyder C, Bohorquez AC, Schmidt CE, Rinaldi C, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 529, 119 (2017)
  31. Guo Z, Fan J, Zhang J, Kang Y, Liu H, Jiang L, Zhang C, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 58, 290 (2016)
  32. Hajlane A, Kaddami H, Joffe R, Ind. Crop. Prod., 100, 41 (2017)
  33. Martin DM, Faccini M, Garcia MA, Amantia D, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 6, 236 (2018)
  34. Lin QT, Pan JX, Lin QL, Liu QJ, J. Hazard. Mater., 263, 517 (2013)
  35. Lu L, Li J, Ng DHL, Yang P, Song P, Zuo M, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 46, 315 (2017)
  36. Wang W, Liang T, Bai H, Dong W, Liu X, Carbohydr. Polym., 179, 297 (2018)
  37. Zhai T, Zheng Q, Cai Z, Xia H, Gong S, Carbohydr. Polym., 148, 300 (2016)
  38. Wang L, Giammar DE, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 448, 331 (2015)
  39. Liu XY, Liu MY, Zhang L, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 511, 135 (2018)
  40. Kolodynska D, Krukowska-Bak J, Kazmierczak-Razna J, Pietrzak R, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 244, 127 (2017)
  41. Fakhre NA, Ibrahim BM, J. Hazard. Mater., 343, 324 (2018)
  42. Ma X, Liu X, Anderson DP, Chang PR, Food Chem., 181, 133 (2015)
  43. Liu Q, Li F, Lu H, Li M, Liu J, Zhang S, Sun Q, Xiong L, Food Chem., 242, 256 (2018)
  44. Yin N, Wang K, Xia YA, Li ZQ, Desalination, 430, 120 (2018)
  45. Liu T, Han X, Wang YG, Yan L, Du B, Wei Q, Wei D, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 508, 405 (2017)
  46. Yuan Q, Chi Y, Yu NS, Zhao Y, Yan WF, Li XT, Dong B, Mater. Res. Bull., 49, 279 (2014)
  47. Fan HL, Zhou SF, Jiao WZ, Qi GS, Liu YZ, Carbohydr. Polym., 174, 1192 (2017)
  48. Hu Q, Xiao Z, Xiong X, Zhou G, Guan X, J. Environ. Sci., 27, 207 (2015)
  49. Putro JN, Santoso SP, Ismadji S, Ju YH, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 246, 166 (2017)
  50. Yakout AA, El-Sokkary RH, Shreadah MA, Abdel Hamid OG, Carbohydr. Polym., 172, 20 (2017)
  51. Cheng TW, Lee ML, Ko MS, Ueng TH, Yang SF, Appl. Clay Sci., 56, 90 (2012)