화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol.116, No.23, 10578-10592, 1994
Investigation of Electronic Communication in Multi-Porphyrin Light-Harvesting Arrays
A comprehensive electrochemical (cyclic and square-wave voltammetry, coulometry) and static spectroscopic (absorption, resonance Raman (RR), electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR)) study is reported for several pentameric and dimeric porphyrin-based arrays and their monomeric building blocks. The pentameric arrays consist of a central tetraarylporphyrin linked to four other tetraarylporphyrins via ethyne groups at the p-positions of the aryl rings. The complexes investigated include Zn-5 pentameric and Zn-2 dimeric porphyrin arrays, a pentameric array in which the four peripheral porphyrins are zinc and the central porphyrin is a free base (Zn(4)Fb(1)), and a mixed zinc-free base porphyrin dimer(Zn(1)Fb(1)). The center-to-center inter-porphyrin distances in the arrays are similar to 20 Angstrom. The dimensions of the dimeric and pentameric arrays are similar to 40 and similar to 60 Angstrom, respectively. The spectroscopic studies were performed on singly and multiply oxidized complexes as well as the neutral species. The electrochemical and spectral properties of the arrays indicate that the electronic communication between the macrocycles is relatively weak in the ground and excited electronic states. The absorption characteristics of the arrays can be explained in terms of long-range, through-space excitonic interactions. The RR, electrochemical, and EPR data indicate that through-bond electronic communication pathways are also open in the arrays. Extremely large RR intensity enhancements are observed for aryl-ring and ethyne-bridge stretching modes. The RR intensity enhancements are attributed to an excited-state conformational change that enhances the conjugation between the pi-electron systems of the porphyrin ring and bridging diarylethyne group. The half-wave potentials for oxidation of the zinc units in Zn-2, Zn(4)Fb(1), and Zns are slightly different. Up to four electron equivalents can be removed from Zn-2 and Zn(1)Fb(1) without compromising the sample integrity; up to five electron equivalents can be removed from Zn(4)Fb(1) and Zn-5.