- Previous Article
- Next Article
- Table of Contents
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.37, No.5, 743-754, May, 2020
Design of vortex finder structure for decreasing the pressure drop of a cyclone separator
E-mail:,
The structure of the vortex finder has an important influence on the pressure drop and separation efficiency of a cyclone, which mainly governs the separation process. In this paper, the traditional vortex finder is slotted on side wall and its bottom is closed, i.e., a slotted vortex finder. The impact of slotted vortex finder on the separation performance of a cyclone is explored by using numerical simulation and experimental validation. Specifically, the gas phase is studied by the Reynolds stress model (RSM), and the particle phase is simulated by the discrete phase model (DPM). The simulation results are in good agreement with the experimental results, revealing higher prediction accuracy. The results indicate that the slotted vortex finder can effectively suppress the generation of the downward swirling flow at the center of the vortex finder and decrease the turbulence intensity at the bottom of the vortex finder and the outer vortex, thereby decreasing the energy loss and increasing the separation efficiency. When the slot length is 0.2De, the slotted vortex finder can reduce the pressure drop by 143.33 Pa while increasing the collection efficiency by 5.51%.
Keywords:Slotted Vortex Finder;Cyclone Separator;Pressure Drop;Particle Trajectory;Turbulence Intensity;Separation Efficiency
- Hiraiwa Y, Oshitari T, Fukui K, Yamamoto T, Yoshida H, Sep. Purif. Technol., 118, 670 (2013)
- Hoffmann AC, Stein LE, Gas cyclones and swirl tubes: principles, design and operation, 2nd Ed., Springer, Berlin (2008).
- Lim KS, Kim HS, Lee KW, J. Aerosol Sci., 35(6), 743 (2004)
- Tan F, Karagoz I, Avci A, Chem. Eng. Commun., 203(9), 1216 (2016)
- Raoufi A, Shams M, Farzaneh M, Ebrahimi R, Chem. Eng. Process., 47(1), 128 (2008)
- Rafiee SE, Sadeghiazad MM, Aerospace Sci. Technol., 63, 110 (2017)
- Gimbun J, Chuah TG, Fakhru'l-Razi A, Choong TSY, Chem. Eng. Process., 44(1), 7 (2005)
- Griffiths WD, Boysan F, J. Aerosol Sci., 27(2), 281 (1996)
- Hoekstra AJ, Derksen JJ, Van Den Akker HEA, Chem. Eng. Sci., 54(13-14), 2055 (1999)
- Slack MD, Prasad RO, Bakker A, Boysan F, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 78(8), 1098 (2000)
- Wang LZ, Feng JM, Gao X, Peng XY, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 117, 394 (2017)
- Li Q, Xu WW, Wang JJ, Jin YH, Sep. Purif. Technol., 141, 53 (2015)
- El-Batsh HM, Appl. Math. Model., 37, 5286 (2013)
- Chen JH, Liu X, Sep. Purif. Technol., 73(2), 100 (2010)
- Khairy E, Chris L, Comput. Fluids, 51, 48 (2011)
- Brar LS, Sharma RP, Dwivedi R, Part. Sci. Technol., 33(1), 34 (2015)
- Zhu YF, Lee KW, J. Aerosol Sci., 30(10), 1303 (1999)
- Rafiee SE, Sadeghiazad MM, J. Marine Sci. Appl., 15, 388 (2016)
- Gao X, Chen JF, Feng JM, Peng XY, Comput. Fluids, 92, 45 (2014)
- Parvaz F, Hosseini SH, Ahmadi G, Elsayed K, Sep. Purif. Technol., 187, 1 (2017)
- Pei BB, Yang L, Dong KJ, Jiang YC, Du XS, Wang B, Powder Technol., 313, 135 (2017)
- Rafiee SE, Sadeghiazad MM, J. Marine Sci. Appl., 15, 157 (2016)
- Lakhbir SB, Amit K, 2015 1st international conference on futuristic trends on computational anslysis and knowledge management, 180 (2015).
- Feng JA, Tang XQ, Wang WB, J. Shehezi Univ.: Natural Sci., 35, 52 (2017)
- Wang JJ, Wang LZ, Liu CW, Chin. J. Process Eng., 5, 251 (2005)
- Hoffmann AC, Stein LE, Bradshaw P, Appl. Mech. Rev., 56, B28 (2003)
- Jin YH, Ji GQ, Cao QY, Wang JJ, J. China Univ. Petroleum, 32, 109 (2008)
- Wang B, Yu AB, Chem. Eng. J., 135(1-2), 33 (2008)
- Su YX, Zheng AG, Zhao BT, Powder Technol., 210(3), 293 (2011)
- Bogodage SG, Leung AYT, Powder Technol., 286, 488 (2015)