화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Polymer(Korea), Vol.44, No.4, 425-435, July, 2020
DOI10.7317/pk.2020.44.4.425  Export Citation
알제리 Pinus Halepensis Tannin Foam을 이용한 수용액에서의 Cr(VI) 흡착
Adsorption of Cr(VI) from Aqueous Solutions Using Algerian Pinus Halepensis Tannin Foam
Zeyneb Hamadi1, 2, †, Rabah Chaid1, Mohammed Kebir2, 3, Siham Amirou4, Hisham Essawy5, and Antonio Pizzi4
  • 1Faculty of engineering, Research Unit Materials, Processes and Environment URMPE, University M’hamed Bougara of Boumerdes/FSI, Frantz Fanon City, Indépendance Avenue 35000 Boumerdes, Algeria, Albania
  • 2Research Unit on Analysis and Technological Development in Environment (URA-DTE/ CRAPC), BP 384, 42000 Bou-Ismail, Tipaza. Algeria, Albania
  • 3Laboratory of Reaction Engineering, FGMGP/USTHB, BP 32, 16111 Algiers, Algeria, Albania
  • 4LERMAB, University of Lorraine, EA 4370, 27 rue Philippe Séguin, BP 21042, 88051 Epinal cedex 9, France
  • 5Department of Polymers and Pigments, National Research Centre, Dokki 12622, Cairo, Egypt
E-mail:
In this study, new adsorbent tannin foam was prepared from Algerian natural pinus halepensis tannin (APTF). The prepared material has been used as an efficient and environmentally friendly adsorbent to remove chromium (Cr(VI)), which is considered as the most toxic pollutant in wastewater. The different features of the adsorbent in terms of the structural and morphological characteristics were studied. The impact of different factors on the adsorption process, such as pH, adsorbent mass, initial Cr(VI) concentration, and temperature, was investigated. The data obtained from the Cr(VI) adsorption revealed an improvement of the removal efficiency with increasing the adsorbent dose, the pH had a notable effect on Cr(VI) adsorption capacity, whereas the effectiveness decreased by rising the initial metal concentration. In addition, it was observed that adsorption efficiency enhanced with increasing temperature, indicating that the adsorption was endothermic and spontaneous in nature. Moreover, the results were best represented by the pseudo-second order kinetic model and the Langmuir isotherm model (qm = 400 mg·g-1) at 293 °K and pH ~2.
Keywords:adsorption;foam;Cr(VI);isotherms;kineticsadsorption;foam;Cr(VI);isotherms;kinetics
  1. Muga HE, Mihelcic JR, J. Environ. Manage., 88, 437 (2008)
  2. Paustenbach D, Finley B, Mowat F, Kerger B, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A, 66, 1295 (2003)
  3. Bacelo Hugo A. M., Santos Silvia C. R., Botelho Cidalia M. S., Chem. Eng. J., 303, 575 (2016)
  4. Fan RY, Xie F, Guan XL, Zhang QL, Luo ZR, Bioresour. Technol., 163, 167 (2014)
  5. Tondi G, Oo CW, Pizzi A, Trosa A, Thevenon MF, Ind. Crop. Prod., 29, 336 (2009)
  6. Sanchez-Martin J, Beltran-Heredia J, Gibello-Perez P, Chem. Eng. J., 168(3), 1241 (2011)
  7. Sanchez-Martin J, Gonzalez-Velasco M, Beltran-Heredia J, J. Wood Chem. Technol., 29, 119 (2009)
  8. Beltran-Heredia J, Sanchez-Martin J, Gomez-Munoz C, Appl. Water Sci., 2, 199 (2012)
  9. Tondi G, Pizzi A, Ind. Crop. Prod., 29, 356 (2009)
  10. Xu QH, Wang YL, Jin LQ, Wang Y, Qin MH, J. Hazard. Mater., 339, 91 (2017)
  11. Nakajima A, Baba Y, Water Res., 38, 2859 (2004)
  12. Nakano Y, Takeshita K, Tsutsumi T, Water Res., 35, 496 (2001)
  13. Hassoune J, Tahiri S, El Krati M, Cervera ML, de la Guardia M, J. Environ. Eng., 144, 040180 (2018)
  14. Celzard A, Zhao W, Pizzi A, Fierro V, Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 527, 4438 (2010)
  15. Kadri N, Khettal B, Aid Y, Kherfellah S, Sobhi W, Brragan-Montero V, Food Chem., 188, 184 (2015)
  16. Meikleham NE, Pizzi A, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 53(11), 1547 (1994)
  17. Chupin L, Motillon C, Charrier-El Bouhtoury F, Pizzi A, Charrier B, Ind. Crop. Prod., 49, 897 (2013)
  18. Lacoste C, Pizzi A, Basso MC, Laborie MP, Celzard A, Ind. Crop. Prod., 52, 450 (2014)
  19. Lopez-Ramon MV, Stoeckli F, Moreno-Castilla C, Carrasco-Marin F, Carbon, 37, 1215 (1999)
  20. Moubarik A, Pizzi A, Allal A, Charrier F, Charrier B, Ind. Crop. Prod., 30, 188 (2009)
  21. Saad H, Khoukh A, Ayed N, Charrier B, Bouhtoury FCE, Ind. Crop. Prod., 61, 517 (2014)
  22. Tondi G, Petutschnigg A, Ind. Crop. Prod., 65, 422 (2015)
  23. Vazquez G, Fontenla E, Santos J, Freire M, GonzalezAlvarez J, Antorrena G, Ind. Crop. Prod., 28, 279 (2008)
  24. Labied R, Benturki O, Eddine Hamitouche AY, Donnot A, Adsorpt. Sci. Technol., 36, 1066 (2018)
  25. Rao M, Parwate AV, Bhole AG, Waste Manage., 22, 821 (2002)
  26. Ucun H, Bayhan YK, Kaya Y, Cakici A, Algur OF, Bioresour. Technol., 85(2), 155 (2002)
  27. Yang J, Yu M, Chen W, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 21, 414 (2015)
  28. Unuabonah EI, Omorogie MO, Oladoja NA, Composites Nanoadsorbents, Editors, Elsevier, p 85 (2019).
  29. Karnjanakom S, Maneechakr P, J. Mol. Struct., 1186, 80 (2019)
  30. Pandey PK, Sharma SK, Sambi SS, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 7, 395 (2010)
  31. Olad A, Azhar FF, Desalin. Water Treat., 52, 2548 (2014)
  32. Liu Q, Liu QZ, Liu BS, Hu T, Liu WL, Yao JS, J. Hazard. Mater., 352, 27 (2018)
  33. Cui J, Wang ZM, Liu FL, Dai PB, Chen R, Zhou HY, Mater. Sci. Forum, 743-744, 523 (2013)
  34. Yurtsever M, Sengil IA, J. Hazard. Mater., 163(1), 58 (2009)
  35. Khosravi R, Moussavi G, Ghaneian MT, Ehrampoush MH, Barikbin B, Ebrahimi AA, Sharifzadeh G, J. Mol. Liq., 256, 163 (2018)
  36. Saha R, Mukherjee K, Saha I, Ghosh A, Ghosh SK, Saha B, Res. Chem. Intermed., 39, 2245 (2013)