화학공학소재연구정보센터
Polymer(Korea), Vol.44, No.6, 827-834, November, 2020
접촉 압력이 PEEK, PTFE 및 UHMWPE의 왕복 마모 거동에 미치는 영향
Effect of Contact Pressure on Reciprocating Wear Behavior of PEEK, PTFE, and UHMWPE
E-mail:,
Engineering plastics are macromolecular compounds composed of covalently bonded macromolecules, which have been widely used in sliding wear-resistance materials in isolation bearings. In this study, an MFT-5000 reciprocating friction testing machine was used to compare the friction and wear performance of polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) under heavy load conditions in dry friction condition. The results show that load has a significant effect on the friction coefficient, wear rate, and wear mechanism of three materials. The instant friction coefficient of PTFE fluctuates under high load, the wear rate clearly increases with the increase in load. Therefore, the application under high load conditions is limited. The wear rate of UHMWPE is the least affected by the load among the three materials. Even when the load exceeds the yield strength, the wear resistance is still good. The friction coefficient of PEEK decreases with the increase in load but maintains a high value that restricts its application in sliding friction pair materials to some degree.
  1. Marcela P, Bernadette D, Thomas K, Vasiliki-Maria A, Int. J. Surf. Sci. Eng., 11, 65 (2017)
  2. Chen BB, Wang JZ, Yan FY, Tribol. Lett., 42, 17 (2011)
  3. Neelima K, Prav KL, Soni NL, Patel RJ, Wear, 342, 85 (2015)
  4. Han JH, Zhang H, Chu PF, Imani A, Zhong Z, Compos. Sci. Technol., 114, 1 (2015)
  5. Dolce M, Cardone D, Croatto F, Bull. Earthquake. Eng., 3, 75 (2005)
  6. Sattar D, Kristopher RJ, Marc M, Marvin WH, Paul JB, Michael C, J. Bridge. Eng., 24, 040190 (2019)
  7. Winstead DL, Flowers D, Pyers CE, Guide specifications for seismic isolation design, 3rd ed., IHS, Washington D.C, 2010.
  8. Wang JP, Liu DX, Ke HB, Xiang DG, Liu Y, Dai L, Zhang XH, Mech. Sci. Technol. Aerosp. Eng., 35, 646 (2016)
  9. Zhang JQ, Huang HX, Ju RH, Chen KT, Li SB, Wang WJ, Yan YS, Am. J. Surg., 213, 87 (2016)
  10. Sawyer GW, Freudenberg KD, Bhimaraj P, Schadler LS, Wear, 254, 573 (2003)
  11. Wang QF, Wang HL, Wang YX, Yan FY, Tribol., 35, 441 (2015)
  12. Chukov DI, Stepashkin AA, Maksimkin AV, Tcherdyntsev VV, Kaloshkin SD, Kuskov KV, Bugakov VI, Compos. Part B-Eng., 76, 79 (2015)
  13. Yao GD, Wang WD, Shen JF, Du MJ, Si MM, Mater. Sci. Technol., 26, 56 (2018)
  14. Quadrini F, Squeo EA, Express. Polym. Lett., 1, 817 (2007)
  15. Jia ZN, Yang YL, Compos. Part B-Eng., 43, 2072 (2012)
  16. Saikko V, Proc. Inst. Eng. H., 220, 723 (2006)
  17. Lauxa KA, Schwartz CJ, Wear, 297, 919 (2013)
  18. Vanessa RF, Jacob S, Yeczain PD, Patrick DB, Matyas A, Int. J. Sustain. Constr. Des., 4 (2013)
  19. Zhang G, Zhanga C, Nardin P, Li WY, Liao H, Coddet C, Tribol. Int., 41, 79 (2008)
  20. Unal H, Mimaroglu A, J. Polym. Eng., 32, 349 (2012)
  21. Guo ZW, Li SF, He KL, Eng. J. Wuhan Univ., 52, 557 (2019)
  22. Wang QF, Wang YX, Wang HL, Fan N, Yan FY, Tribol. Int., 104, 73 (2016)
  23. Unal H, Mimaroglub A, Mater. Des., 24, 183 (2003)
  24. Pitenis AA, Harris KL, Junk CP, Blackman GS, Sawyer WG, Krick BA, Tribol. Lett., 57, 4 (2015)
  25. Ye J, Khare HS, Burris DL, Wear, 297, 1095 (2013)
  26. Makinson K, Tabor D, Nature, 201, 464 (1964)
  27. Blanchet TA, Kennedy FE, Wear, 153, 229 (1992)
  28. He KL, Sheng CX, Guo ZW, Sun YW, Yuan CQ, Lubr. Eng., 4, 54 (2019)
  29. Aderikha VN, Krasnov AP, Naumkin AV, Wear, 386-387, 63 (2017)
  30. Rudresh BM, Kumar BN, Trans. Indian Inst. Met., 71, 339 (2018)