화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Applied Chemistry for Engineering, Vol.32, No.2, 143-148, April, 2021
DOI10.14478/ace.2020.1111  Export Citation
정전기 방전에 의해 제조된 흑연박리 그래핀 첨가 폴리이미드 막의 열전도 향상
Thermal Conductivity Enhancement of Polyimide Film Induced from Exfoliated Graphene Prepared by Electrostatic Discharge Method
임채훈1, 김경훈1, 2, 안동해1, 이영석1, 2, †
  • 1충남대학교 응용화학공학과
  • 2충남대학교 탄소융복합기술연구소
Chaehun Lim1, Kyung Hoon Kim1, 2, Donghae An1, and Young-Seak Lee1, 2, †
  • 1Department of Applied Chemistry Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
  • 2Institute of Carbon Fusion Technology (InCFT), Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
E-mail:
초록
본 연구에서는 폴리이미드(polyimide; PI) 막(film)의 열전도도를 향상시켜 그 응용성을 확대하고자, 정전기 방전법을 이용하여 흑연봉으로부터 그래핀을 제조하고 제조된 그래핀을 첨가하여 폴리아믹산(polyamic acid; PAA) 전구체로부터 200 μm두께의 폴리이미드 기반 열전도 막을 제조하였다. 정전기 방전 기법으로 생산된 그래핀은 라만, XPS, TEM 등을 이용하여 물성을 평가하였다. 제조된 그래핀은 라만 스펙트럼 분석 결과 ID/IG 값이 0.138이며, XPS 분석 결과 C/O 비율이 24.91로 구조적, 표면화학적으로 우수한 물성을 나타내었다. 또한, 흑연 박리 그래핀의 첨가량에 따라 폴리이미드 막의 열전도도는 지수함수적으로 증가하였으며, 그래핀 함량을 40% 초과 시에는 폴리이미드 막을 제조할 수 없었다. 그래핀을 폴리아믹산 중량 대비40 wt% 첨가하여 제조된 폴리이미드 막의 열원반(hot disk) 열전도도는 51W/mK를 나타내었으며, 순수한 폴리이미드 막의 열전도도(1.9 W/mK)보다 크게 향상되었다. 이 결과는 정전기 방전기법으로 제조된 박리 그래핀의 우수한 물성에 기인한 것으로 판단된다.
A thermally conductive 200 μm thick polyimide-based film was made from a polyamic acid (PAA) precursor containing graphene prepared from graphite rod using an electrostatic discharge method in order to improve the thermal conductivity and expand the applicability of polyimide (PI) film. Properties of graphene produced by electrostatic discharge were measured by Raman spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). As a result of Raman spectrum and XPS analyses of as-prepared graphene, the ID/IG ratio was 0.138 and C/O value was 24.91 which are excellent structural and surface chemical properties. Moreover, thermal conductivities of polyimide films increased exponentially according to graphene contents but when the graphene content exceeded 40%, the polyimide film could not maintain its shape. The thermal conductivity of carbonized PI film made from PAA containing 40 wt% of graphene was 51 W/mK which is greatly enhanced from the pristine carbonized PI film (1.9 W/mK). This result could be originated from superior properties of graphene prepared from the electrostatic discharge method.
Keywords:Thermal conductivity;Electrostatic discharge;Graphene;Polyimide film
  1. Chen S, Wang Q, Zhang M, Huang R, Huang Y, Tang J, Liu J, Carbon, 167, 270 (2020)
  2. Kumar P, Shahzad F, Yu S, Hong SM, Kim YH, Koo CM, Carbon, 94, 494 (2015)
  3. Chevigny C, Dalmas F, Di Cola E, Gigmes D, Bertin D, Boue F, Jestin J, Macromolecules, 44(1), 122 (2011)
  4. Guo Y, Ruan K, Yang X, Ma T, Kong J, Wu N, Zhang J, Gu J, Guo Z, J. Mater. Chem. C, 7, 7035 (2019)
  5. Jiang Q, Wang X, Zhu Y, Hui D, Qiu Y, Compos. B Eng., 56, 408 (2014)
  6. Zhang F, Feng Y, Qin M, Gao L, Li Z, Zhao F, Zang Z, Lv F, Feng W, Adv. Funct. Mater., 29, 190138 (2019)
  7. Li H, Dai S, Miao J, Wu X, Chandrasekharan N, Qiu H, Yang J, Carbon, 126, 319 (2018)
  8. Guo Y, Xu G, Yang X, Ruan K, Ma T, Zhang Q, Gu J, Wu Y, Liu H, Guo Z, J. Mater. Chem. C, 6, 3004 (2018)
  9. Papageorgiou DG, Kinloch IA, Young RJ, Prog. Mater. Sci., 90, 75 (2017)
  10. Ovid’Ko IA, Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci., 34, 1 (2013)
  11. Neto AC, Guinea F, Peres NM, Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Rev. Mod. Phys, 81, 109 (2009)
  12. Balandin AA, Nat. Mater., 10(8), 569 (2011)
  13. Shahil KM, Balandin AA, Solid State Commun., 152, 1331 (2012)
  14. Chen J, Yao B, Li C, Shi G, Carbon, 64, 225 (2013)
  15. Alam SN, Sharma N, Kumar L, Graphene, 6, 1 (2017)
  16. Tseng IH, Chang JC, Huang SL, Tsai MH, Polym. Int., 62, 827 (2013)
  17. Wei S, Yu Q, Fan Z, Liu S, Chi Z, Chen X, Zhang Y, Xu J, RSC Adv., 8, 22169 (2018)
  18. Su CY, Lu AY, Xu Y, Chen FR, Khlobystov AN, Li LJ, ACS Nano, 5, 2332 (2011)
  19. Kwon YJ, Kwon Y, Park HS, Lee JU, Adv. Mater. Int., 6, 190009 (2019)
  20. Lim S, Han JH, Kang HW, Lee JU, Lee W, Carbon Lett., 30, 409 (2020)
  21. Van Thanh D, Li LJ, Chu CW, Yen PJ, Wei KH, RSC Adv., 4, 6946 (2014)
  22. Kotkin AS, Kochergin VK, Kabachkov EN, Shulga YM, Lobach AS, Manzhos RA, Krivenko AG, Mater. Today Energy, 17, 100459 (2020)
  23. Van Thanh D, Chen HC, Li LJ, Chu CW, Wei KH, RSC Adv., 3, 17402 (2013)
  24. Tuinstra F, Koenig JL, J. Chem. Phys., 53, 1126 (1970)
  25. Reich S, Thomsen C, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 362, 2271 (2004)
  26. Sreeja V, Vinitha G, Reshmi R, Anila E, Jayaraj MK, Opt. Mater., 66, 460 (2017)
  27. Gomez CV, Tene T, Guevara M, Usca GT, et al., Appl. Sci., 9, 2539 (2019)
  28. Ferrari AC, Meyer J, Scardaci V, Casiraghi C, Lazzeri M, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 97, 187401 (2006)
  29. Hao Y, Wang Y, Wang L, Ni Z, Wang Z, Wang R, Koo CK, Shen Z, Thong JT, Small, 6, 195 (2010)
  30. Koissin V, Bor T, Kotanjac Z, Lefferts L, Warnet L, Akkerman R, C Journal of Carbon Research, 2, 19 (2016).
  31. Silva ND, Salas BV, Nedev N, Alvarez MC, Rull JMB, Zlatev R, Stoytcheva M, J. Nanomater., 2017, 10 (2017)
  32. Pei S, Cheng HM, Carbon, 50, 3210 (2012)
  33. Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Piner RD, Kohlhaas KA, Kleinhammes A, Jia Y, Wu Y, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS, Carbon, 45, 1558 (2007)
  34. Kwan YCG, Ng GM, Huan CHA, Thin Solid Films, 590, 40 (2015)
  35. Diez N, Sliwak A, Gryglewicz S, Grzyb B, Gryglewicz G, RSC Adv., 5, 81831 (2015)
  36. Manoratne C, Rosa S, Kottegoda IRM, Mat. Sci. Res. India, 14, 19 (2017)
  37. Loos J, Alexeev A, Grossiord N, Koning CE, Regev O, Ultramicroscopy, 104, 160 (2005)