Choice of substrate for thin crystalline silicon solar cells requires a compromise between cost and quality. There are three generic substrate types, namely a transparent substrate (such as glass), an opaque substrate (such as a ceramic or metal) and low-cost multicrystalline silicon. Glass has the advantage of eliminating absorption within the substrate. However, the larger effective diffusion length, the improved surface passivation and the increased process flexibility obtainable with an opaque substrate, particularly low-cost multicrystalline silicon, may considerably outweigh the modest optical benefits of a transparent substrate. In this paper it is shown that the advantage in effective diffusion length that is required of a cell grown on an opaque substrate in order to offset the light-trapping advantages of a glass substrate is about a factor of two.