화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.17, No.5, 516-523, September, 2000
The Use of a Partially Simulated Exothermic Reactor to Test Nonlinear Algorithms
E-mail:
Two nonlinear control algorithms for controlling nonlinear systems include the receding horizon method and the nonlinear neural network inverse model methods. These methods have been found to be useful in dealing with difficult-to-control nonlinear systems, especially in simulated systems. However although much simulation work has been performed with these methods, simulation only is inadequate to guarantee that these algorithms could be successfully implemented in real plants. For this reason, a relatively low cost and simple online experimental configuration of a partially simulated continuous reactor has been devised which allows for the realistic testing of a wide range of nonlinear estimation and control techniques i.e. receding horizon control and neural network inverse model control methods. The results show that these methods are viable and attractive nonlinear methods for real-time application in chemical reactor systems.
  1. Bequette BW, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 30, 1391 (1991) 
  2. Biegler L, Rawlings J, "Optimization Approaches to Nonlinear Model Predictive Control," In Chemical Process Control CPCIV Proceedings (1991)
  3. Economou C, Morari M, Palsson BO, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 25, 403 (1986) 
  4. Hunt KJ, Sbarbaro D, "IEE Control Engineering Series," London (1992)
  5. Hussain MA, Ph.D. Thesis, "Inverse Model Control Strategy using Neural Networks: Analysis, Simulation and Online Implementation," Univ. of London (1996)
  6. Hussain MA, J. Art. Int. Eng., 13, 55 (1999) 
  7. Kershenbaum L, Kittisupakorn P, "The Use of a Partially Simulated Exothermic (PARSEX) Reactor for Experimental Testing of Control Algorithms," Transaction of Institution of Chemical Engineers, Vol. 72, Part A, January (1994)
  8. Kershenbaum L, Mayne D, Pytak R, Vinter R, "Receeding Horizon Control," Workshop Advances in Model Based Predictive Control, Oxford, U.K. (1993)
  9. Kwon W, Pearson A, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 20(5), 833 (1977)
  10. Limqueco LC, Kantor JC, Comput. Chem. Eng., 14(5), 427 (1990) 
  11. Manye D, Michalska H, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 35(7), 814 (1990) 
  12. Maybeck PS, Reduced order Kalman filter design and performance analysis, in ARGARD, NATO advisory group for aerospace research and development, No. 256, London (1982)
  13. Mayne D, "Optimization in Model Based Control," In 4th IFAC Symposium on Dynamic and Control of Chemical Reactors, Distillation Columns and Batch Processes, DyCord+'95, Denmark (1995)
  14. Nahas EP, Henson MA, Seborg DE, Comput. Chem. Eng., 16(2), 1039 (1992) 
  15. Pao YH, Phillips SM, Sobajic DJ, Int. J. Control, 56(2), 263 (1992)
  16. Psichogios DM, Ungar LH, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 30, 2564 (1991)