The microfiltration performance of a novel membrane module design with helically wound hollow fibers is compared with that obtained with a standard commercial-type crossflow module containing linear hollow fibers. Cell suspensions (yeast, E. coli, and mammalian cell cultures) commonly clarified in the biotechnology industry are used for this comparison. The effect of variables such as transmembrane pressure, particle suspension concentration, and feed flow rate on membrane performance is evaluated. Normalized permeation fluxes versus flow rate or Dean number behave according to a heat transfer correlation obtained with centrifugal instabilities of the Taylor type. The microfiltration performance of this new module design, which uses secondary flows in helical tubes, is significantly better than an equivalent current commercial crossflow module when filtering suspensions relevant to the biotechnology industry. Flux and capacity improvements of up to 3.2-fold (constant transmembrane pressure operation) and 3.9-fold (constant flux operation), respectively, were obtained with the helical module over those for the linear module.