화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.8, No.6, 506-514, November, 2002
Performance of Water-repellent Treated Wooden Bath by Contact Angle Analysis
E-mail:
This study is designed to measure the durability of a water-repellent, which is used for treating a wooden bath or bathroom exposed to soapy water. Sometimes, the wooden bath is exposed to hot and alkaline water for long periods of time. The durability of the water-repellent is measured by examining the changes surface free energy by contact angle, chemical variation by FT-IR and surface morphology by SEM, hot water temperatures and varying lengths of exposure to alkaline conditions. For the specimen treated by water-repellent, according to the result obtained from contact angle analysis, the surface of sample was found to be non-polar. After dipping in alkaline liquid, the polarity of the surface of the sample increased with increasing dipping time. Therefore, the contact angle for diiodomethane, being a non-polar liquid, exhibited little change. In the test using low alkaline conditions, the water-repellent showed no chemical or mechanical surface variation for 7 days at pH 7 and at a temperature of 80 ℃. In the test using highly alkaline conditions, the water-repellent exhibited a change in its surface polarity value at pH 13. However, in spite of the change in its surface polarity value, the durability of the water-repellent remained constant. The results of the FT-IR and SEM tests showed no variation in the chemical and mechanical properties of the surface of the water-repellent, which was subjected to low alkaline conditions for a period of 7 days and at a temperature of 80 ℃.
  1. Nguyen T, Johns WE, Wood Sci. Technol., 13, 29 (1979)
  2. Kalnins MA, Knaebe MT, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 6, 1325 (1992)
  3. Wenzel RN, Ind. Eng. Chem., 28, 988 (1936) 
  4. Johnson RE, Dettre RH, Wettability, J.C. Berg Ed., Ch. 1, Marcel Dekker, New York (1993)
  5. chibowski E, Gonzalez-Caballero F, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 7, 1195 (1993)
  6. Qin X, Chang WV, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 10(10), 963 (1996)
  7. Shen Q, Nylund J, Rosenholm JB, Holzforschung, 52, 521 (1998)
  8. Nakae H, Inui R, Hirata Y, Saito H, Acta Mater., 46, 2313 (1998)
  9. Kamusewitz H, Possart W, Paul D, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 156, 271 (1999)
  10. Apel-Paz M, Marmur A, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 146, 273 (1999)
  11. Wolansky G, Marmur A, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 156, 381 (1999)
  12. Kwok DY, Neumann AW, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 161, 31 (2000)
  13. Li D, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 116, 1 (1996)
  14. Schulz J, Nardin M, Modern Approaches to Wettability: Theory and Applications, M.E. Schrader and G. Loeb Eds., Ch. 4, Plenum Press, New York (1992)
  15. Inigo AC, Vicente-Tavera S, Rives V, Vicente MA, Color Res. Appl., 22, 141 (1997)
  16. Wu W, Nancollas GH, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 79, 229 (1999)
  17. Wu S, J. Polym. Sci. C: Polym. Lett., 34, 19 (1971)
  18. Shimizu RN, Demarquette NR, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 76(12), 1831 (2000)
  19. CIELAB, Supplement No. 2 to CIE Publication No. 15, Bureau Central de la CIE, Paris (1976)
  20. Fowkes FM, Tischler DO, J. Polym. Sci., 22, 547 (1984)
  21. Chihani T, Flodin P, Hjertberg T, Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, pp. 713-725 (1993)
  22. Sheb Q, Nylund J, Rosenholm JB, Holzforschung, 52, 521 (1998)
  23. Kim MT, Thin Solid Films, 311(1-2), 157 (1997)