Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.8, No.6, 506-514, November, 2002
Performance of Water-repellent Treated Wooden Bath by Contact Angle Analysis
E-mail:
This study is designed to measure the durability of a water-repellent, which is used for treating a wooden bath or bathroom exposed to soapy water. Sometimes, the wooden bath is exposed to hot and alkaline water for long periods of time. The durability of the water-repellent is measured by examining the changes surface free energy by contact angle, chemical variation by FT-IR and surface morphology by SEM, hot water temperatures and varying lengths of exposure to alkaline conditions. For the specimen treated by water-repellent, according to the result obtained from contact angle analysis, the surface of sample was found to be non-polar. After dipping in alkaline liquid, the polarity of the surface of the sample increased with increasing dipping time. Therefore, the contact angle for diiodomethane, being a non-polar liquid, exhibited little change. In the test using low alkaline conditions, the water-repellent showed no chemical or mechanical surface variation for 7 days at pH 7 and at a temperature of 80 ℃. In the test using highly alkaline conditions, the water-repellent exhibited a change in its surface polarity value at pH 13. However, in spite of the change in its surface polarity value, the durability of the water-repellent remained constant. The results of the FT-IR and SEM tests showed no variation in the chemical and mechanical properties of the surface of the water-repellent, which was subjected to low alkaline conditions for a period of 7 days and at a temperature of 80 ℃.
- Nguyen T, Johns WE, Wood Sci. Technol., 13, 29 (1979)
- Kalnins MA, Knaebe MT, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 6, 1325 (1992)
- Wenzel RN, Ind. Eng. Chem., 28, 988 (1936)
- Johnson RE, Dettre RH, Wettability, J.C. Berg Ed., Ch. 1, Marcel Dekker, New York (1993)
- chibowski E, Gonzalez-Caballero F, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 7, 1195 (1993)
- Qin X, Chang WV, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 10(10), 963 (1996)
- Shen Q, Nylund J, Rosenholm JB, Holzforschung, 52, 521 (1998)
- Nakae H, Inui R, Hirata Y, Saito H, Acta Mater., 46, 2313 (1998)
- Kamusewitz H, Possart W, Paul D, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 156, 271 (1999)
- Apel-Paz M, Marmur A, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 146, 273 (1999)
- Wolansky G, Marmur A, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 156, 381 (1999)
- Kwok DY, Neumann AW, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 161, 31 (2000)
- Li D, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 116, 1 (1996)
- Schulz J, Nardin M, Modern Approaches to Wettability: Theory and Applications, M.E. Schrader and G. Loeb Eds., Ch. 4, Plenum Press, New York (1992)
- Inigo AC, Vicente-Tavera S, Rives V, Vicente MA, Color Res. Appl., 22, 141 (1997)
- Wu W, Nancollas GH, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 79, 229 (1999)
- Wu S, J. Polym. Sci. C: Polym. Lett., 34, 19 (1971)
- Shimizu RN, Demarquette NR, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 76(12), 1831 (2000)
- CIELAB, Supplement No. 2 to CIE Publication No. 15, Bureau Central de la CIE, Paris (1976)
- Fowkes FM, Tischler DO, J. Polym. Sci., 22, 547 (1984)
- Chihani T, Flodin P, Hjertberg T, Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, pp. 713-725 (1993)
- Sheb Q, Nylund J, Rosenholm JB, Holzforschung, 52, 521 (1998)
- Kim MT, Thin Solid Films, 311(1-2), 157 (1997)