화학공학소재연구정보센터
Macromolecular Research, Vol.11, No.4, 283-290, August, 2003
Effect of Hydrophilic-Lipophilic Balance of Drugs on Their Release Behavior from Amphiphilic Matrix
E-mail:
Organic drugs including aspirin, omeprazole, and naproxen with three different levels of octanol/water partition coefficient were examined for their release behavior from the amphiphilic PCL-b-PEO-b-PCL (PCEC) matrix. Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of PCEC illustrated a well defined two-phase morphology consisted of dispersed poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) domain and continuous polycaprolactone (PCL) phase. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X-ray diffractometry (XRD) experiments verified that three model drugs are dissolved as a molecular dispersion in PCEC matrix. The release of hydrophilic aspirin closely followed the water absorption profile of the matrix indicating that its major fraction is present in PEO domain. However, substantial amount of aspirin present in less hydrophilic region displayed discontinuous biphasic release pattern. In the case of omeprazole with intermediate hydrophobicity consistent release behavior was observed for a period of 24 hrs after the rapid liberation of ca. 10% of the drug presumably partitioned in PEO phase. It was ascribed to the fact that the progressive hydration of PCEC matrix gradually increased the chance of drug/water exposure to compensate the exhaustion of device. Naproxen with the highest octanol/water distribution coefficient among three model drugs exhibited a limited release of 35% for 24 hrs. Finally, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose phthalate (HPMCP)/PCEC blend matrix demonstrated an accelerated and quantitative release of hydrophobic naproxen by generating high porosity and thereby expanding polymer/water interface.
  1. Mitra SB, Polymers as Biomaterials, S.W. Shalaby, Ed., Plenum Press, New York, pp. 293 (1984)
  2. Huang Y, Chung T, Tzeng T, Int. J. Pharm., 182, 93 (1999) 
  3. Hsu Y, Gresser JD, Trantolo DJ, Lyons CM, Gangahram PRJ, J. Control. Release, 40, 293 (1996) 
  4. Perez M, Zunitti C, Lamprecht A, Ubrich N, Astier A, Hoffman M, Bodmeier R, Maincent P, J. Control. Release, 65, 429 (1999) 
  5. Delie F, Berton M, Allemann E, Gurny R, Int. J. Pharm., 214, 25 (2001) 
  6. Lee CW, Kimura Y, Macromol. Res., 11(1), 42 (2003)
  7. Benoit MA, Baras B, Gillard J, Int. J. Pharm., 184, 73 (1999) 
  8. Youxin L, Volland C, Kissel T, J. Control. Release, 32, 121 (1994) 
  9. Lin WJ, Flanagan DR, Linhardt RJ, Polymer, 40(7), 1731 (1999) 
  10. Yoo Y, Chung CY, Polym.(Korea), 18(1), 103 (1994)
  11. Kim WS, Song HS, Lee BO, Kwon KH, Lim YS, Kim MS, Macromol. Res., 10(5), 253 (2002)
  12. Molina I, Li S, Martinez MB, Vert M, Biomaterials, 22, 363 (2001) 
  13. Bezemer JM, Radersma R, Gripma DW, Dijkstra PJ, Feijen J, vanBlitterswijk CA, J. Control. Release, 64, 179 (2000) 
  14. Boobis A, Rawlins M, Thomas S, Wilkins M, Therapeutic Drugs, C. Dollery, Ed., Churchill Livingstone Press, London (1999)
  15. Iordanskii AL, Feldstein MM, Markin VS, Hadgragt J, Plate NA, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 49, 287 (2000) 
  16. Muller RH, Peters K, Int. J. Pharm., 160, 229 (1998) 
  17. LeCorre P, Rytting JH, Gajan V, Chevanne F, LeVerge R, J. Microencapsul., 14(2), 243 (1997)
  18. Gorner T, Gref R, Michenot D, Sommer F, Tran MN, Dellacherie E, J. Control. Release, 57, 259 (1999) 
  19. Higuchi T, J. Pharm. Sci., 50, 1145 (1963)