화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korea-Australia Rheology Journal, Vol.18, No.3, 121-126, September, 2006
Effect of compression on the response of a magneto-rheological suspension
E-mail:
A carbonyl iron-based magneto-rheological suspension was compressed in the direction of the applied magnetic field and the change in rheological properties was measured. It was found that the compression did not have a large effect on the magneto-rheological response, which is in contrast to recent reports in the literature describing an almost order of magnitude increase in the shear yield stress. The difference can be attributed to the latter test's use of a sliding wedge apparatus which imparts considerable shearing to the sample during the compression.
  1. Ashour O, Rogers CA, Kordonsky W, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 7, 123 (1996)
  2. Bossis G, Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Electro-rheological Fluids and Magneto-rheological Suspensions, Nice, France, 9-13 July 2001, World Scientific, Singapore (2002)
  3. Bullough WA, Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Electro-rheological Fluids, Magneto-rheological Suspensions and Associated Technology, Sheffield, UK, 10-14 July 1995, World Scientific, Singapore (1996)
  4. Carlson JD, Low-cost MR fluid sponge devices, in Tao, R. (ed), Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Electro-rheological Fluids, Magneto-rheological Suspensions, Hawaii, 19-23 July 1999, World Scientific, Singapore, 621-628 (2000)
  5. Carlson JD, Catanzarite DM, Clair KA, Commercial magneto-rheological fluid devices, in Bullough, W.A. (ed), Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Electro-rheological Fluids, Magneto- rheological Suspensions and Associated Technology, Sheffield, UK, 10-14 July 1995, World Scientific, Singapore, 20-28 (1996)
  6. Chin BD, Park JH, Kwon MH, Park OO, Rheol. Acta, 40(3), 211 (2001) 
  7. Ginder JM, MRS Bull., 26 (1998)
  8. Kim DH, Chu SH, Ahn KH, Lee SJ, Korea-Aust. Rheol. J., 11(3), 233 (1999)
  9. Klingenberg DJ, AIChE J., 47(2), 246 (2001) 
  10. Nakano M, Koyama K, Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Electro-rheological Fluids, Magneto-rheological Suspensions and their Applications, Yonezawa, Japan, 22-25 July 1997, World Scientific, Singapore (1998)
  11. Phule P, MRS Bull., 23 (1998)
  12. Rankin PJ, Ginder JM, Klingenberg DJ, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci., 3, 373 (1998)
  13. Rankin PJ, Horvath AT, Klingenberg DJ, Rheol. Acta, 38(5), 471 (1999) 
  14. See HT, Applied Rheology, 11, 70 (2001)
  15. See HT, Probing the microstructure of field-responsive suspensions with rheometry, in Proc. 31st Annual Australasian Chemical Engineering Conference CHEMECA 2003, Adelaide, Australia, 28 Sept. - 1 Oct. 2003, Paper 248 (2003)
  16. Stix G, Sci. Am., 284, 22 (2001)
  17. Sung JH, Choi HJ, Korea-Aust. Rheol. J., 16(4), 193 (2004)
  18. Tang X, Zhang X, Tao R, Rong Y, J. Appl. Phys., 87, 2634 (2000) 
  19. Tao R, Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Electro-rheological Fluids, Magneto-rheological Suspensions, Hawaii, 19-23 July 1999, World Scientific, Singapore (2000)
  20. Tao R, Condens. Matter, 13, R979 (2001) 
  21. Tao R, Lan YC, Xu X, Structure-enhanced yield shear stress in electrorheological fluids, in Bossis, G. (ed), Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Electro-rheological Fluids and Magneto-rheological Suspensions, Nice, France, 9-13 July 2001, World Scientific, Singapore, 712-718 (2002)
  22. Tian Y, Meng Y, Mao H, Wen S, Phys. Rev. E, 65, 031507 (2002) 
  23. Tian Y, Meng Y, Mao H, Wen S, J. Appl. Phys., 92, 6875 (2002) 
  24. Tian Y, Meng Y, Wen S, Phys. Rev. E, 67, 051501 (2003)