Methods of measurement of the phase transition temperatures in physical molecular gels are analyzed. The "falling ball" technique, NMR, and rheology are compared. Temperature versus concentration phase diagrams can be easily obtained, and the reliability and workability of the methods are discussed. It appears that rheology is the more accurate and convenient technique while the falling ball method provides acceptable Delta H, Delta S values, but the melting temperature values are significantly altered. With NMR, kinetic information associated with the molecular aggregation process can also be extracted.