Chemical Physics Letters, Vol.412, No.1-3, 210-216, 2005
Performance of the DFTB method in comparison to DFT and semiempirical methods for geometries and energies Of C-20-C-86 fullerene isomers
The performance of both non-iterative (NCC) and self-consistent charge (SCC) versions of the density functional tight binding (DFTB) method, as well as AM1 and PM3 methods, has been compared with the B3LY-P method, a hybrid density functional theory (DFT) method, for equilibrium geometries and relative energies of various isomers Of C-20-C-86 fullerenes. Both NCC- and SCC-DFTB methods compare very favorably with B3LYP both in geometries and isomer relative energies, while AM1 and PM3 do noticeably worse. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier B.V.