BACKGROUND: Electrocoagulation is an alternative to the conventional coagulation method, to treat different types of waters and wastewaters. Although there have been many reports on the technical suitability of electrocoagulation, no study has made a direct comparison of the economics of the two processes. RESULTS: Concerning the technical feasibility, no significant differences were found in the results achieved by the two technologies in the treatment of synthetic suspensions, emulsions and solutions of dyes, when the same values of pH and aluminium concentration were adopted in the reaction systems. Regarding the economic comparison, the electrocoagulation process presents lower operating costs for low and intermediate aluminium doses, but results depend on the particular coagulant reagent selected at high doses. The highest operational costs were obtained with conventional coagulation with aluminium sulphate (in the range 3-60 mg dm(-3) aluminium). Comparing electrocoagulation and conventional coagulation with aluminium polychloride, the electrocoagulation process presents lower operational costs for low and intermediate doses. However, this situation changes for high aluminium doses. CONCLUSION: Coagulation and electrocoagulation techniques give very similar yields in the removal of different types of pollutants; therefore an economic comparison is of major importance in order to recommend the use of one of the technologies. Nevertheless, it has to be noted that operational costs are of the same order of magnitude for the two processes. Thus, the cost of the electrocoagulation process compares favourably with that of conventional coagulation for small coagulant demands, but the results at high doses depend on the particular coagulant reagent selected. (C) 2008 Society of Chemical Industry