By means of in situ small/wide-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS/WAXS) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), we examined evolutions of lamellar crystal thickness for alpha and beta crystals, respectively, in bulk-crystallized syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS) during the partial melting-reorganization process upon progressive heating up to 290 degrees C. For the SAXS data analysis, the Kratky-Porod approximation proves to be particularly helpful in extracting the crystal thickness when approaching final melting where crystalline lamellae (near equilibration with the melt) exist in low concentrations as dispersed entities instead of in arrays. On the basis of the crystal thicknesses at elevated temperatures under solid-melt equilibration, we constructed melting lines of the two separate forms in the Gibbs-Thomson phase plane. The extrapolated (to infinite lamellar thickness) equilibrium melting temperature T-m,T-alpha* approximate to 294 degrees C of the a form is moderately lower than T-m,T-beta* approximate to 306 degrees C of the beta form. The two melting lines intercept at a crossover temperature T-Q approximate to 284 degrees C and crystal thickness l(Q) approximate to 9.6 nm, where the relative thermal stability of the two phases inverses. For crystals thicker than l(Q) (practically hard to reach for bulk crystallization under ambient pressure), the beta form is the stable phase; for crystals thinner than I-Q (the commonly accessible case), the a form is circumstantially more stable. With crystallinity-corrected values of the heat of fusion Delta H-f,H-alpha approximate to 82 MJ m(-3) and Delta H-f,H-beta approximate to 146 MJ m(-3) obtained from a combination of DSC and WAXS results, we determined from the slope (= 2 sigma(e)/Delta H-f) of the melting line that basal surface energy sigma(e,alpha) approximate to 8.2 mJ m(-2) and sigma(e,beta) approximate to 26.8 mJ m(-2) which are considerably lower than those expected for tight folds, indicative of nonadjacently re-entered or loosely looped folds. The combination of lower T-m*, Delta H-f, Delta S-f, and sigma(e) values renders the a phase highly competitive in the rate of nucleation at low temperatures but much less so at high temperatures as compared to the beta phase. The higher sigma(e,beta) value is also consistent with the observation that the beta phase is more responsive to externally added heterogeneous nucleation agents.