화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.27, No.6, 1847-1853, November, 2010
Screening of Candida utilis and medium optimization for co-production of S-adenosylmethionine and glutathione
E-mail:
An effective S-adenosylmethionine and glutathione enriching yeast mutant of Candida utilis CCTCC M 209298 was first screened from plates containing 0.5 g/L of DL-ethionine by complex mutagenesis with UV and γ-ray in this study. Medium components optimization for enhanced co-production of S-adenosylmethionine and glutathione by C. utilis CCTCC M 209298 was further carried out using response surface methodology. The significant factors influencing S-adenosylmethionine and glutathione co-production were selected by Plackett-Burman design as sucrose, KH2PO4 and L-methionine, and Box-Behnken design was applied for further optimization studies. Based on these approaches, the optimized concentrations on medium components for higher co-production of S-adenosylmethionine and glutathione were sucrose 35.4 g/L, (NH4)2SO4 10 g/L, KH2PO4 12.3 g/L, MgSO4·7H2O, 0.05 g/L, CaCl2 0.05 g/L and L-methionine 4.6 g/L. The medium optimization by response surface methodology led to a total production of 589.3 mg/L on S-adenosylmethionine and glutathione, which was 2.4-fold increased compared with the medium without optimization.
  1. Mato JM, Alvarez L, Ortiz P, Pajares MA, Pharmacol. Therapeut., 73, 265 (1997)
  2. Fontecave M, Atta M, Mulliez E, Trends Biochem. Sci., 29, 243 (2004)
  3. Lu SC, Int. J. Biochem. Cell. B., 32, 391 (2000)
  4. Meister A, Anderson ME, Ann. Rev. Biochem., 52, 711 (1983)
  5. Pastore A, Federici G, Bertini E, Piemonte F, Clin. Chim. Acta, 333, 19 (2003)
  6. Sies H, Free Radical Bio. Med., 27, 916 (1999)
  7. Li Y, Wei GY, Chen J, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 66(3), 233 (2004)
  8. Liu H, Lin JP, Cen PL, Pan YJ, Process Biochem., 39, 1993 (2004)
  9. Lin JP, Tian J, You JF, Jin ZH, Xu ZN, Cen PL, Biochem. Eng. J., 21, 19 (2004)
  10. Myers RH, Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments, 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons Press, NY, USA (2002)
  11. Cho JH, Kim YB, Kim EK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 26(3), 754 (2009)
  12. Lin SS, Dou WF, Xu HY, Li HZ, Xu ZH, Ma YH, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 75(5), 1015 (2007)
  13. Tietze F, Anal. Biochem., 27, 502 (1969)
  14. She QB, Nagao I, Hayakawa T, Tsuge H, Biochem. Bioph. Res. Co., 205, 1748 (1994)
  15. Xu GY, Yan J, Guo XQ, Liu K, Li XG, Gou XJ, Chin. J. Food Sci., 26, 342 (2005)
  16. Plackett RL, Burman JP, Biometrika, 33, 305 (1946)
  17. Kalil SJ, Maugeri F, Rodrigues MI, Process Biochem., 35(6), 539 (2000)
  18. Shao N, Wei GY, Ge XG, Nie M, J. Radiat. Res. Radiat. Process, 28, 107 (2010)
  19. Heck JX, Flores SH, Hertz PF, Ayub MAZ, Process Biochem., 40, 107 (2005)
  20. Masip L, Veeravalli K, Georgiou G, Antioxid. Redox. Sign., 8, 753 (2006)
  21. Yoon GS, Ko KH, Kang HW, Suh JW, Kim YS, Ryu YW, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 39(3), 466 (2006)