Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.28, No.1, 22-26, January, 2011
A comparative study of carbon dioxide capture capabilities between methanol solvent and aqueous monoethanol amine solution
E-mail:
Simulations have been performed to compare the performance of CO2 capture power between 98.5 wt% methanol solvent and 30 wt% MEA aqueous solution. A general purpose chemical process simulator, PRO/II with PROVISION release 8.3 was used for the modeling of CO2 capture process. For the simulation of CO2 capture process using methanol as a solvent, NRTL liquid activity coefficient model was used for the estimation of the liquid phase non-idealities, Peng-Robinson equation of state model was selected for the prediction of vapor phase non-idealities, and Henry’s law option was chosen for the prediction of the solubilities of light gases in methanol and water solvents. Amine special thermodynamic package built-in PRO/II with PROVISION release 8.3 was used for the modeling of CO2 capture process using MEA aqueous solution. We could conclude that the 30 wt% of MEA aqueous solution showed better performance than the 98.5 wt% methanol solvent in CO2 capture capability. Through this study, we tried to compare the
differences between the two processes from the aspects of capital and operating costs using a commercial process simulator. This will guide the optimal process design in the carbon dioxide capture process.
- Mavroudi M, Kaldis SP, Sakellaropoulos GP, Fuel., 82(15-17), 2153 (2003)
- Park SW, Choi BS, Lee BD, Park DW, Kim SS, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 10(6), 1033 (2004)
- Park SW, Choi BS, Lee BD, Park DW, Kim SS, Sep. Sci. Technol., 41(5), 829 (2006)
- Alie C, Backham L, Croiset E, Douglas PL, Energy Conv. Manag., 46(3), 475 (2005)
- Ko MS, Park CI, Kim HY, J. Korean Inst. Gas., 7, 7 (2003)
- Austgen DM, Rochelle GT, Chen CC, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 30, 543 (1991)
- Li MH, Shen KP, Fluid Phase Equilibrium., 85, 129 (1993)
- Jou FY, Otto FD, Mather AE, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 33(8), 2002 (1994)
- Dawodu OF, Meisen A, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 39(3), 548 (1994)
- Diao YF, Zheng XY, He BS, Chen CH, Xu XC, Energy Conv. Manag., 45(13-14), 2283 (2004)
- Cho WI, Na YH, Shin DK, Rhim KK, Cho JH, J. Korean Inst. Gas., 10(2), 22 (2006)
- Gabrielsen J, Svendsen HF, Michelsen ML, Stenby EH, Kontogeorgis GM, Chem. Eng. Sci., 62(9), 2397 (2007)
- Sartori G, Savage DW, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 22, 239 (1983)
- Lee BD, Kim DM, Cho JH, Park SW, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 26(3), 818 (2009)
- Renon H, Prausnitz JM, AIChE J., 14, 135 (1986)
- Simulation Science Inc., PRO/II user guide, Simulation Science Inc., South Lake Forest (2001)
- Nelder JA, Mead RA, Comput. J., 7, 303 (1965)