화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.17, No.1, 62-70, January, 2011
Rheological characteristics of coal.water slurry using microwave pretreatment - A statistical approach
E-mail:
The present study addresses the treatment of microwave energy for rheological characteristics of coal-water slurries (CWS) performed in an online Bohlin viscometer. Detailed experimental investigations were carried out for high ash Indian coal (Jamadoba washery, 38% ash). Experiments were conducted at high power level (900 W) for all the test samples in microwave oven. The exposure times were fixed at 30, 60, 90 and 120 s. Before and after treatment, the test samples were ground and sieved into different fractions for chemical and physical analysis. Central composite design (CCD) was applied to study the influence of particle diameter, solid concentration, microwave (MW) exposure time and shear rate on apparent viscosity for rheology characteristics of coal-water slurry. A quadratic model was developed for apparent viscosity using Design-Expert software. The model was used to calculate the optimum operating conditions for minimization of apparent viscosity. The apparent viscosity (22.83 mPa s) produced at these operating conditions showed an excellent agreement with the amounts predicted by the models.
  1. Roussy G, Pearce JA, U.S. Patent Application No. US 6,436,359 B1 (2002)
  2. Haque KE, Int. J. Miner. Process., 57(1), 1 (1999)
  3. Schiffmann RF, Commercializing microwave systems: path to success or failure, microwaves: theory and application in material processing 111, in: Clark DE, Folz DC, Oda SJ, Silberglit R (Eds.), Ceramic Trans. (1995)
  4. Spencer PL, US Patent 2,480 (1949)
  5. Meikap BC, Purohit NK, Mahadevan V, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 281(1), 225 (2005)
  6. Sahoo BK, Prakash R, Meikap BC, International Conference on Beneficiation of Fines and its Technology, Tata Steel Ltd., Jamshedpur (2007)
  7. Majumder SK, Chandna K, De DS, Kundu G, Int. J. Miner. Process., 79, 217 (2006)
  8. Boylu F, Dincer H, Atesok G, Fuel Process. Technol., 85(4), 241 (2004)
  9. He MZ, Wang YM, Forssberg E, Powder Technol., 147(1-3), 94 (2004)
  10. Dincer H, Boylu F, Sirkeci AA, Atesok G, Int. J. Miner. Process., 70, 41 (2003)
  11. Turian RM, Attal JF, Sung D, Wedgewood LE, Fuel., 81, 2019 (2002)
  12. Logos C, Nguyen QD, Powder Technol., 88(1), 55 (1996)
  13. Martın-Alfonso JE, Moreno G, Valencia C, Sanchez MC, Franco JM, Gallegos C, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 15(5), 687 (2009)
  14. Kawatra SK, Bakshi AK, Miller TE, Int. J. Miner. Process., 44, 155 (1996)
  15. Shi FN, NapierMunn TJ, Int. J. Miner. Process., 47(1), 103 (1996)
  16. Shi FN, NapierMunn TJ, Int. J. Miner. Process., 47(3), 153 (1996)
  17. Tsai SC, Knell EW, Fuel., 65, 566 (1986)
  18. Papachristodoulou G, Trass O, Powder Technol., 40, 353 (1984)
  19. Frankel NA, Acrivos A, Chem. Eng. Sci., 22, 847 (1967)
  20. Mishra PN, Severson DE, Owens TC, Chem. Eng. Sci., 25, 653 (1970)
  21. Thomas DG, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 20, 267 (1965)
  22. Alam MZ, Muyibi SA, Toramae J, J. Environ. Sci., 19, 674 (2007)
  23. Montgomery DC, Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA (2001)
  24. Sahu JN, Acharya J, Meikap BC, Bioresour. Technol., 101, 1974 (2010)
  25. Sahu JN, Acharya J, Meikap BC, J. Hazard. Mater., 172(2-3), 818 (2009)
  26. Myers RH, Response Surface Methodology, Allyn and Bacon, New York (1971)
  27. Gunaraj V, Murugan N, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 88, 266 (1999)
  28. Box GEP, Hunter JS, Ann. Math. Stat., 28, 195 (1957)
  29. Box GEP, Hunter WG, J. Technometr., 3, 311 (1961)
  30. Napier-Munn TJ, The Central Composite Rotatable Design JKMRC, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 1-9 (2000)
  31. Box GEP, Hunter WG, Statistics for Experiments: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis and Model Building, Wiley Interscience (1987)