Macromolecular Research, Vol.19, No.8, 853-860, August, 2011
pH-Dependent Mode of Antibacterial Actions of Low Molecular Weight Water-Soluble Chitosan (LMWSC) against Various Pathogens
E-mail:,
This study examined the antibacterial mode of action of low molecular weight water-soluble chitosan (LMWSC; MW1, MW3, MW5 and MW10) using a combination of approaches, including antibacterial assays, culture in media with different pH values, bactericidal kinetics, cellular leakage measurements, depolarization, and electron microscopy, as well as an in vivo study utilizing a wound infection and wound healing model. The antibacterial activity of LMWSC was related inversely to pH, with higher activities being observed at lower pH values. In addition, evaluation of the effect of bactericidal concentrations of LMWSC on the morphology of Bacillus megaterium and Escherichia coli O-157 revealed that it induces filamentation. Furthermore, the degree of depolarization (in Escherichia coli, pH 7.4) and calcein leakage (lipid composition; L-α-phosphatidylethanolamine (PE)/L-α-phosphatidyl-DL-glycerol (PG)=7/3 (w/w), pH 5.4 and 7.4) were evaluated. Moreover, cells cultured at various pHs were evaluated by confocal microscopy (pH 5.4 and 7.4). These results showed that treatment with LMWSC with different molecular weights had different effects on bacteria. In particular, LMWSC (MW10) cause more visible damage to the bacterial cell membrane than lower molecular weight LMWSC, which is due most likely to the penetration of cells by the lower weight molecules. Interestingly, MW5 was found to attack the membrane and penetrate the cells. In addition, scanning electron microscopy showed that MW10 caused significant morphological changes to the surface of the bacteria. Finally, an in vivo study utilizing a wound infection or healing model showed that LMWSC had the potential for use as a lead compound for the development of a novel anti-infective or healing compound.
Keywords:low molecular weight water-soluble chitosan (LMWSC);antibacterial activity;scanning electron microscopy.
- Raafat D, von Bargen K, Haas A, Sahl HG, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 74, 3764 (2008)
- Tosteson MT, Holmes SJ, Razin MR, Tosteson DC, J. Membr. Biol., 87, 35 (1985)
- Jeon YJ, Kim SK, J. Chitin Chitosan, 6, 163 (2001)
- Park PJ, Je JY, Byun HG, Moon SH, Kim SK, J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 14, 317 (2004)
- Park PJ, Je JY, Kim SK, Carbohydr. Polym., 55, 17 (2004)
- Porporatto C, Bianco ID, Riera CM, Correa SG, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 304(2), 266 (2003)
- Maezaki Y, Tsuji K, Nakagawa Y, Kawai Y, Akimoto M, Tsugita T, Takekawa W, Terada A, Hara H, Mitsuoka T, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 57, 1439 (1993)
- Nah JW, Jang MK, J. Polym. Sci. A: Polym. Chem., 40(21), 3796 (2002)
- Kim TH, Park IK, Nah JW, Choi YJ, Cho CS, Biomaterials, 25, 3783 (2004)
- Jang MK, Jeong YI, Nah JW, Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces, 81, 530 (2010)
- Park Y, Kim MH, Park SC, Cheong H, Jang MK, Nah JW, Hahm KS, J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 18, 1729 (2008)
- Rhoades J, Roller S, Microbiol., 66, 80 (2002)
- Park Y, Park SN, Park SC, Park JY, Park YH, Hahm JS, Hahm KS, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 321(3), 631 (2004)
- Matsuzaki K, Sugishita K, Miyajima K, Febs Lett., 449, 221 (1999)
- Pouny Y, Rapaport D, Mor A, Nicolas P, Shai Y, Biochemistry, 31, 12416 (1992)
- Park Y, Park SN, Park SC, Shin SO, Hahm KS, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1764, 24 (2006)
- Kristian SA, Timmer AM, Liu GY, Lauth X, Sal-Man N, Rosenfeld Y, Shai Y, Gallo RL, Nizet V, Faseb J., 21, 1107 (2007)
- Lee DG, Kim HN, Park Y, Kim HK, Choi BH, Choi CH, Hahm KS, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1598, 185 (2002)
- Lutkenhaus J, Trends Genet., 6, 22 (1990)
- Liu XF, Guan YL, Yang DZ, Li Z, De Yao K, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 79(7), 1324 (2001)
- den Kamp JAO, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 48, 47 (1979)
- Fernandes JC, Eaton P, Gomes AM, Pintado ME, Xavier MF, Ultramicroscopy, 109, 854 (2009)
- Stewart JCM, Anal. Biochem., 104, 10 (1980)