Fluidization is widely used in industries and has been extensively studied, either experimentally or theoretically, in the past decades. In recent years, a coupled simulation approach of discrete element method (DEM) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been successfully developed to study the gas-solid flow and heat transfer in fluidization at a particle scale. However, to date, such studies mainly deal with spherical particles. The effect of particle shape on fluidization is recognized but not properly quantified. In this paper, the CFD-DEM approach is extended to consider the fluidization of ellipsoidal particles. In the simulation, particles used are either oblate or prolate, with aspect ratios varying from very flat (aspect ratio =0.25) to elongated (aspect ratio =3.5), representing cylinder-type and disk-type shaped particles, respectively. The commonly used correlations to determine the fluid drag force acting on a non-spherical particle are compared first. Then the model is verified in terms of solid flow patterns. The effect of aspect ratio on the flow pattern, the relationship between pressure drop and gas superficial velocity, and microscopic parameters such as coordination number, particle orientation and force structure are investigated. It is shown that particle shape affects bed permeability and the minimum fluidization velocity significantly. The coordination number generally increases with aspect ratio deviating from 1.0. The analysis of particle orientations shows that the bed structures for ellipsoids are not random as that for spheres. Oblate particles prefer facing upward or downward while prolate particles prefer horizontal orientation. Spheres have the largest particle-particle contact force and fluid drag force under the comparable conditions. With aspect ratio deviating from 1.0, particle-particle interaction and fluid drag become relatively weak. The proposed model shows a promising method in examining the effect of particle shape on different flow behaviour in gas fluidization. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.